Home The Word Brain My Amedeo FAQ Privacy About Flying Publisher   


OLIENA
Language recovery after stroke
App | Video | PDF (278 pp) | Web

  Prostate Cancer

  Free Subscription


Articles published in Radiology

Retrieve available abstracts of 34 articles:
HTML format
Text format



Single Articles


    May 2018
  1. LOPCI E, Guazzoni G, Lazzeri M
    (68)Ga Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT for Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Complementary or Alternative to Multiparametric MR Imaging.
    Radiology. 2018;287:725-726.
    PubMed     Text format    


    April 2018
  2. LAWTON CAF
    Prostate Cancer: Improving the Flow of Research.
    Radiology. 2018;287:5-9.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    March 2018
  3. UENO Y, Tamada T, Takahashi S
    Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Using Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging.
    Radiology. 2018;286:1093-1094.
    PubMed     Text format    


    February 2018
  4. CHATTERJEE A, Bourne RM, Wang S, Devaraj A, et al
    Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer with Noninvasive Estimation of Prostate Tissue Composition by Using Hybrid Multidimensional MR Imaging: A Feasibility Study.
    Radiology. 2018 Feb 2:171130. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018171130.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  5. KAJI Y, Inamura K
    Diagnostic Ability with Abbreviated Biparametric and Full Multiparametric Prostate MR Imaging: Is the Use of PI-RADS Version 2 Appropriate for Comparison?
    Radiology. 2018;286:726-727.
    PubMed     Text format    


    January 2018
  6. DINH AH, Melodelima C, Souchon R, Moldovan PC, et al
    Characterization of Prostate Cancer with Gleason Score of at Least 7 by Using Quantitative Multiparametric MR Imaging: Validation of a Computer-aided Diagnosis System in Patients Referred for Prostate Biopsy.
    Radiology. 2018 Jan 22:171265. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171265.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  7. SCIALPI M, Martorana E, Aisa MC, Rondoni V, et al
    Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging: Is It Really an Alternative to Multiparametric MR Imaging?
    Radiology. 2018;286:360-361.
    PubMed     Text format    


    December 2017
  8. TEMIZ MZ
    MR Imaging-guided Strategies for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men.
    Radiology. 2017;285:1052-1053.
    PubMed     Text format    


  9. THOENY HC, Barbieri S, Froehlich JM, Turkbey B, et al
    Functional and Targeted Lymph Node Imaging in Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Challenges.
    Radiology. 2017;285:728-743.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    November 2017
  10. HECTORS SJ, Semaan S, Song C, Lewis S, et al
    Advanced Diffusion-weighted Imaging Modeling for Prostate Cancer Characterization: Correlation with Quantitative Histopathologic Tumor Tissue Composition-A Hypothesis-generating Study.
    Radiology. 2017 Nov 8:170904. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170904.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  11. VERMA S, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC, Oto A, et al
    The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Radiology. 2017;285:343-356.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    October 2017
  12. BOROFSKY S, George AK, Gaur S, Bernardo M, et al
    What Are We Missing? False-Negative Cancers at Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate.
    Radiology. 2017 Oct 20:152877. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017152877.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    July 2017
  13. KUHL CK, Bruhn R, Kramer N, Nebelung S, et al
    Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen.
    Radiology. 2017 Jul 20:170129. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170129.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  14. GREER MD, Shih JH, Lay N, Barrett T, et al
    Validation of the Dominant Sequence Paradigm and Role of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Imaging in PI-RADS Version 2.
    Radiology. 2017 Jul 19:161316. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161316.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    June 2017
  15. TAY KJ, Cheng CWS, Lau WKO, Khoo J, et al
    Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer with In-Bore MR-guided Focused Ultrasound: Two-Year Follow-up of a Phase I Trial-Complications and Functional Outcomes.
    Radiology. 2017 Jun 26:161650. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161650.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  16. KWAK JT, Sankineni S, Xu S, Turkbey B, et al
    Prostate Cancer: A Correlative Study of Multiparametric MR Imaging and Digital Histopathology.
    Radiology. 2017 Jun 5:160906. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017160906.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    May 2017
  17. PAHWA S, Schiltz NK, Ponsky LE, Lu Z, et al
    Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging-guided Strategies for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men.
    Radiology. 2017 May 17:162181. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162181.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    April 2017
  18. JAMSHIDI N, Margolis DJ, Raman S, Huang J, et al
    Multiregional Radiogenomic Assessment of Prostate Microenvironments with Multiparametric MR Imaging and DNA Whole-Exome Sequencing of Prostate Glands with Adenocarcinoma.
    Radiology. 2017 Apr 28:162827. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162827.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  19. TAMADA T, Prabhu V, Li J, Babb JS, et al
    Prostate Cancer: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness-Comparison between Conventional and Kurtosis Models.
    Radiology. 2017 Apr 10:162321. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162321.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  20. SABOURI S, Chang SD, Savdie R, Zhang J, et al
    Luminal Water Imaging: A New MR Imaging T2 Mapping Technique for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.
    Radiology. 2017 Apr 10:161687. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161687.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    March 2017
  21. BARTH BK, De Visschere PJ, Cornelius A, Nicolau C, et al
    Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Short Dual-Pulse Sequence versus Standard Multiparametric MR Imaging-A Multireader Study.
    Radiology. 2017 Mar 27:162020. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162020.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    February 2017
  22. YU AC, Badve C, Ponsky LE, Pahwa S, et al
    Development of a Combined MR Fingerprinting and Diffusion Examination for Prostate Cancer.
    Radiology. 2017 Feb 10:161599. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161599.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    November 2016
  23. PEREZ-LOPEZ R, Mateo J, Mossop H, Blackledge MD, et al
    Diffusion-weighted Imaging as a Treatment Response Biomarker for Evaluating Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study.
    Radiology. 2016 Nov 22:160646.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  24. TAN N, Lin WC, Khoshnoodi P, Asvadi NH, et al
    In-Bore 3-T MR-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2-based Diagnostic Performance for Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Radiology. 2016 Nov 18:152827.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  25. CHEVILLET JR, Khokhlova TD, Giraldez MD, Schade GR, et al
    Release of Cell-free MicroRNA Tumor Biomarkers into the Blood Circulation with Pulsed Focused Ultrasound: A Noninvasive, Anatomically Localized, Molecular Liquid Biopsy.
    Radiology. 2016 Nov 1:160024.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    October 2016
  26. ROSENKRANTZ AB, Babb JS, Taneja SS, Ream JM, et al
    Proposed Adjustments to PI-RADS Version 2 Decision Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection.
    Radiology. 2016 Oct 26:161124.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    September 2016
  27. MCDONALD AM, Swain TA, Mayhew DL, Cardan RA, et al
    CT Measures of Bone Mineral Density and Muscle Mass Can Be Used to Predict Noncancer Death in Men with Prostate Cancer.
    Radiology. 2016 Sep 5:160626.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    August 2016
  28. CHOI JY, Yang J, Noworolski SM, Behr S, et al
    18F Fluorocholine Dynamic Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Initial Clinical-Pathologic Comparisons.
    Radiology. 2016 Aug 11:160220.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    February 2016
  29. HOANG DINH A, Melodelima C, Souchon R, Lehaire J, et al
    Quantitative Analysis of Prostate Multiparametric MR Images for Detection of Aggressive Prostate Cancer in the Peripheral Zone: A Multiple Imager Study.
    Radiology. 2016 Feb 9:151406.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  30. PARK SY, Jung DC, Oh YT, Cho NH, et al
    Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers.
    Radiology. 2016 Feb 2:151133.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    January 2016
  31. PEREZ-LOPEZ R, Lorente D, Blackledge MD, Collins DJ, et al
    Volume of Bone Metastasis Assessed with Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted Imaging Is Associated with Overall Survival in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
    Radiology. 2016 Jan 25:150799.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  32. METZGER GJ, Kalavagunta C, Spilseth B, Bolan PJ, et al
    Detection of Prostate Cancer: Multiparametric MR Imaging Models Developed by Using Registered Correlative Histopathologic Results.
    Radiology. 2016 Jan 13:151089.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    September 2015
  33. KOBUS T, van der Laak JA, Maas MC, Hambrock T, et al
    Contribution of Histopathologic Tissue Composition to Quantitative MR Spectroscopy and Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Prostate.
    Radiology. 2015 Sep 29:142889.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    July 2015
  34. LITJENS GJ, Elliott R, Shih NN, Feldman MD, et al
    Computer-extracted Features Can Distinguish Noncancerous Confounding Disease from Prostatic Adenocarcinoma at Multiparametric MR Imaging.
    Radiology. 2015 Jul 17:142856.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


Thank you for your interest in scientific medicine.


AMEDEO Prostate Cancer is free of charge.
This policy is made possible thanks to a media sponsorship by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Design: