Home The Word Brain My Amedeo FAQ Privacy About Flying Publisher   


Oliena Studio

Stroke and language recovery: 9000+ videos

EspañolItalianoSarduEnglish | PDF+


  Breast Cancer

  Free Subscription


Articles published in J Surg Oncol

Retrieve available abstracts of 57 articles:
HTML format
Text format



Single Articles


    September 2019
  1. ZHOU L, Wang Y, Cai R, Huang J, et al
    Pedicled descending branch latissimus dorsi mini-flap in repairing partial mastectomy defect: Shoulder functional and esthetic outcomes.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019;120:518-526.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    August 2019
  2. SANTIAGO L, Adrada BE, Caudle AS, Clemens MW, et al
    The role of three-dimensional printing in the surgical management of breast cancer.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug 22. doi: 10.1002/jso.25680.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  3. SENER SF, Sargent RE, Lee C, Manchandia T, et al
    MRI does not predict pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019 Aug 9. doi: 10.1002/jso.25663.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  4. SCHWARZ GS, Grobmyer SR, Djohan RS, Cakmakoglu C, et al
    Axillary reverse mapping and lymphaticovenous bypass: Lymphedema prevention through enhanced lymphatic visualization and restoration of flow.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019;120:160-167.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  5. KRAENZLIN FS, Saunders H, Aliu O, Cooney D, et al
    Classification of breast tissue expander infections: Back to the basics.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019;120:142-147.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  6. TAMIRISA N, Williamson HV, Thomas SM, Westbrook KE, et al
    The impact of chemotherapy sequence on survival in node-positive invasive lobular carcinoma.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019;120:132-141.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    July 2019
  7. VAN DEN HOVEN I, van Klaveren D, Verheuvel NC, van la Parra RFD, et al
    Predicting the extent of nodal involvement for node positive breast cancer patients: Development and validation of a novel tool.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul 23. doi: 10.1002/jso.25644.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  8. MOUSAVI SR, Akbari ME, Zarrintan S
    Vascularized gastroepiploic lymph node transfer significantly improves breast cancer-related lymphedema.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul 16. doi: 10.1002/jso.25607.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  9. HOUPU Y, Fei X, Yang Y, Fuzhong T, et al
    Use of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram to guide intraoperative sentinel lymph node frozen sections in patients with early breast cancer.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul 16. doi: 10.1002/jso.25638.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  10. LEE TC, Reyna C, Shaughnessy E, Lewis JD, et al
    Screening of populations at high risk for breast cancer.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul 8. doi: 10.1002/jso.25611.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    June 2019
  11. SENER SF
    Advances in axillary surgery for breast cancer 2019.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun 25. doi: 10.1002/jso.25591.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  12. LIN CY, Liu HE, Cheng MH
    Factors associated with professional healthcare advice seeking in breast cancer-related lymphedema.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun 18. doi: 10.1002/jso.25523.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  13. ZHAO B, Tsai C, Hunt KK, Blair SL, et al
    Adherence to surgical and oncologic standards improves survival in breast cancer patients.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun 6. doi: 10.1002/jso.25506.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  14. CORSI F, Bossi D, Combi F, Papadopoulou O, et al
    Radio-guided vs clip-guided localization of nonpalpable mass-like lesions of the breast from a screened population: A propensity score-matched study.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019;119:916-924.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  15. CHAUDHRY A, Oliver JD, Vyas KS, Alsubaie SA, et al
    Outcomes analysis of Goldilocks mastectomy and breast reconstruction: A single institution experience of 96 cases.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019;119:1047-1052.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    May 2019
  16. BRUENDERMAN EH, Bhutiani N, Mercer MK, McMasters KM, et al
    Evaluating the relationship between ductal carcinoma in situ, calcifications, and margin status in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019;119:694-699.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    March 2019
  17. ZHONG W, Tan L, Jiang WG, Chen K, et al
    Effect of younger age on survival outcomes in T1N0M0 breast cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar 20. doi: 10.1002/jso.25457.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  18. VIEIRA RAC, Boni RADS, Silva VD
    Reply: ITADE flap after mastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer: A good choice for mid-sized defects of the chest wall based on a systematic review of thoracoabdominal flaps.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar 18. doi: 10.1002/jso.25436.
    PubMed     Text format    


  19. BURATTINI ACB, Horacio GS, Beloti TR
    Reply: ITADE flap after mastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer: A good choice for mid-sized defects of the chest wall, based on a systematic review of thoracoabdominal flaps.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar 18. doi: 10.1002/jso.25439.
    PubMed     Text format    


  20. TAN MG, Isaranuwatchai W, DeLyzer T, Butler K, et al
    A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MS-TRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019;119:388-396.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  21. BANKS A, Coronado G, Zimmerman R, Iyengar G, et al
    Breast conserving surgery with targeted intraoperative radiotherapy for the management of ductal carcinoma in situ.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019;119:409-420.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    February 2019
  22. PARK KU, Kyrish K, Terrell J, Yi M, et al
    Surgeon perception versus reality: Opioid use after breast cancer surgery.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb 8. doi: 10.1002/jso.25395.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    January 2019
  23. DASGUPTA H, Islam S, Alam N, Roy A, et al
    Hypomethylation of mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 is associated with chemotolerance of breast carcinoma: Clinical significance.
    J Surg Oncol. 2019;119:88-100.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    December 2018
  24. HELLINGMAN D, de Wit-van der Veen BJ, Wan OY, van der Ploeg IM, et al
    Sentinel lymph node nonvisualization after intratumoral radioisotope tracer injection in breast cancer is not associated with a higher nodal metastasis rate or worse outcomes.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec 24. doi: 10.1002/jso.25339.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  25. LAWS A, Brar MS, Bouchard-Fortier A, Leong B, et al
    Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:1205-1211.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  26. JIN L, Wu X, Zha L, Feng Y, et al
    Adjacent skin rotation flap for large defect in primary breast tumor.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:1199-1204.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    November 2018
  27. BERGER ER, Bilimoria KY, Kinnier CV, Minami CA, et al
    Assessment of hospital-level adjusted breast cancer sentinel lymph node positivity rates.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov 27. doi: 10.1002/jso.25294.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  28. PANCHAL H, Pilewskie ML, Sheckter CC, Albornoz CR, et al
    National trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with locally advanced breast cancer.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov 27. doi: 10.1002/jso.25315.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  29. YU TJ, Liu YY, Hu X, Di GH, et al
    No survival improvement of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among women with invasive lobular carcinoma.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:928-935.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  30. OLASEHINDE O, Alatise O, Arowolo O, Adisa A, et al
    Safety and feasibility of early postmastectomy discharge and home drain care in a low resource setting.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:861-866.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  31. XU F, Sun H, Zhang C, Jiang H, et al
    Comparison of surgical complication between immediate implant and autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A multicenter study of 426 cases.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:953-958.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  32. MAY M, Chin C, Hirji S, Horowitz D, et al
    Comparing preoperative imaging modalities in patient selection for breast intraoperative radiotherapy.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:959-965.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    October 2018
  33. JOHNSON AR, Singhal D
    Immediate lymphatic reconstruction.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:750-757.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    September 2018
  34. BEAR HD, Wan W, Robidoux A, Rubin P, et al
    Re: Using the 21-gene assay from core needle biopsies to choose neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: A multicenter trial. Journal of Surgical Oncology 2017;115(8):917-923.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:722.
    PubMed     Text format    


  35. HO OA, Lin YL, Pappalardo M, Cheng MH, et al
    Nipple-sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap using thoracodorsal recipient vessels and a low lateral incision.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:621-629.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    August 2018
  36. OHASHI R, Namimatsu S, Sakatani T, Naito Z, et al
    Prognostic utility of atypical mitoses in patients with breast cancer: A comparative study with Ki67 and phosphohistone H3.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018 Aug 11. doi: 10.1002/jso.25152.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    July 2018
  37. SUSNIK B, Schneider L, Swenson KK, Krueger J, et al
    Predictive value of breast magnetic resonance imaging in detecting mammographically occult contralateral breast cancer: Can we target women more likely to have contralateral breast cancer?
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:221-227.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  38. YOON-FLANNERY K, DeStefano LM, De La Cruz LM, Fisher CS, et al
    Quality of life and sexual well-being after nipple sparing mastectomy: A matched comparison of patients using the breast Q.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:238-242.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  39. SMITH JR, Jaffe J, Pruitt J, Yao K, et al
    The effect of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy on breast-related charges: A 5-year analysis.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:212-220.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    June 2018
  40. FUJIMOTO Y, Higuchi T, Nishimukai A, Miyagawa Y, et al
    High levels of serum CA15-3 and residual invasive tumor size are associated with poor prognosis for breast cancer patients with non-pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun 24. doi: 10.1002/jso.25125.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  41. ROSTAS JW, Bhutiani N, Crigger M, Crawford SMW, et al
    Calculation of breast volumes from mammogram: Comparison of four separate equations relative to mastectomy specimen volumes.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;117:1848-1853.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    May 2018
  42. SHEN S, Xu Q, Zhou Y, Mao F, et al
    Comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy guided by blue dye with or without indocyanine green in early breast cancer.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018 May 22. doi: 10.1002/jso.25058.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    April 2018
  43. VOLDERS JH, Negenborn VL, Haloua MH, Krekel NMA, et al
    Breast-specific factors determine cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after breast-conserving therapy: Results from the randomized COBALT study.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;117:1001-1008.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    March 2018
  44. ALTUNDAG K
    Breast cancer subtypes and local recurrence rate after surgery for bone metastasis to the extremities.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1002/jso.24987.
    PubMed     Text format    


  45. FOSTER D, Choy N, Porter C, Ahmed S, et al
    Axillary reverse mapping with indocyanine green or isosulfan blue demonstrate similar crossover rates to radiotracer identified sentinel nodes.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;117:336-340.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  46. SO A, De La Cruz LM, Williams AD, Bahng J, et al
    The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and lumpectomy cavity shavings on re-excision rate in pure ductal carcinoma in situ-A single institution's experience.
    J Surg Oncol. 2018;117:558-566.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    February 2018
  47. PERCY DB, Pao JS, McKevitt E, Dingee C, et al
    Number of nodes in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: Are surgeons still biased?
    J Surg Oncol. 2018 Feb 26. doi: 10.1002/jso.25010.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    December 2017
  48. GERVAIS MK, Burtenshaw SM, Maxwell J, Dickson BC, et al
    Clinical outcomes in breast angiosarcoma patients: A rare tumor with unique challenges.
    J Surg Oncol. 2017;116:1056-1061.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  49. GIANNINI V, Bianchi V, Carabalona S, Mazzetti S, et al
    MRI to predict nipple-areola complex (NAC) involvement: An automatic method to compute the 3D distance between the NAC and tumor.
    J Surg Oncol. 2017;116:1069-1078.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  50. ALVARADO M, Lucci A, Manders J
    Best practices for multidisciplinary integration of a DCIS genomic assay into clinical practice.
    J Surg Oncol. 2017;116:1016-1020.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  51. PATTEN CR, Walsh K, Sarantou T, Hadzikadic-Gusic L, et al
    Changes in margin re-excision rates: Experience incorporating the "no ink on tumor" guideline into practice.
    J Surg Oncol. 2017;116:1040-1045.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  52. HWANG H, Park S, Koo JS, Park HS, et al
    Factors predictive of occult nipple-areolar complex involvement in patients with carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    J Surg Oncol. 2017;116:1046-1055.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    November 2017
  53. TATARA T, Mukohara T, Shimono Y, Yamasaki T, et al
    Expression of programmed death-1 in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer.
    J Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov 28. doi: 10.1002/jso.24937.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  54. ONEGA T, Weiss JE, Goodrich ME, Zhu W, et al
    Relationship between preoperative breast MRI and surgical treatment of non-metastatic breast cancer.
    J Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov 11. doi: 10.1002/jso.24796.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    October 2017
  55. LEE S, Jung Y, Bae Y
    Immediate chest wall reconstruction using an external oblique myocutaneous flap for large skin defects after mastectomy in advanced or recurrent breast cancer patients: A single center experience.
    J Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct 29. doi: 10.1002/jso.24830.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  56. ALTUNDAG K
    Is HER2 loss after neoadjuvant chemotherapy determinant for the choice of adjuvant treatment in HER2 positive breast cancer patients?
    J Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct 2. doi: 10.1002/jso.24839.
    PubMed     Text format    


    September 2017
  57. NOGUCHI M, Ohno Y, Morioka E, Noguchi M, et al
    A novel oncoplastic technique for breast cancer localized in the lower pole of the breast.
    J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep 20. doi: 10.1002/jso.24824.
    PubMed     Text format    


Thank you for your interest in scientific medicine.


AMEDEO Breast Cancer is free of charge.
This policy is made possible thanks to a media sponsorship by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Design: