Home The Word Brain My Amedeo FAQ Privacy About Flying Publisher   


The Angels Initiative

Stroke prevention


  Breast Cancer

  Free Subscription


Articles published in Radiology

Retrieve available abstracts of 91 articles:
HTML format



Single Articles


    June 2022
  1. KIM SY, Cho N, Hong H, Lee Y, et al
    Abbreviated Screening MRI for Women with a History of Breast Cancer: Comparison with Full-Protocol Breast MRI.
    Radiology. 2022 Jun 14:213310. doi: 10.1148/radiol.213310.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    May 2022
  2. KIM S, Tran TXM, Song H, Ryu S, et al
    Mammographic Breast Density, Benign Breast Disease, and Subsequent Breast Cancer Risk in 3.9 Million Korean Women.
    Radiology. 2022 May 17:212727. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212727.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  3. KATAOKA M
    The Contribution of Imaging as a Prognostic Marker of Luminal Breast Cancer.
    Radiology. 2022 May 10:220748. doi: 10.1148/radiol.220748.
    PubMed    


  4. KWON BR, Shin SU, Kim SY, Choi Y, et al
    Microcalcifications and Peritumoral Edema Predict Survival Outcome in Luminal Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Radiology. 2022 May 10:211509. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211509.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  5. WANDERS AJT, Mees W, Bun PAM, Janssen N, et al
    Interval Cancer Detection Using a Neural Network and Breast Density in Women with Negative Screening Mammograms.
    Radiology. 2022;303:269-275.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    April 2022
  6. TAOUREL P
    MRI to Detect Contralateral Breast Cancer in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: An Increase in Overall Survival to Be Confirmed.
    Radiology. 2022 Apr 26:220546. doi: 10.1148/radiol.220546.
    PubMed    


  7. FREITAS V, Li X, Amitai Y, Au F, et al
    Contralateral Breast Screening with Preoperative MRI: Long-Term Outcomes for Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
    Radiology. 2022 Apr 26:212361. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212361.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  8. LAURITZEN AD, Rodriguez-Ruiz A, von Euler-Chelpin MC, Lynge E, et al
    An Artificial Intelligence-based Mammography Screening Protocol for Breast Cancer: Outcome and Radiologist Workload.
    Radiology. 2022 Apr 19:210948. doi: 10.1148/radiol.210948.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    March 2022
  9. LARSEN M, Aglen CF, Lee CI, Hoff SR, et al
    Artificial Intelligence Evaluation of 122 969 Mammography Examinations from a Population-based Screening Program.
    Radiology. 2022 Mar 29:212381. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212381.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    February 2022
  10. LEE AY, Ray KM
    Surrogate Clinical End Points for Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Radiology. 2022 Feb 1:213026. doi: 10.1148/radiol.213026.
    PubMed    


  11. PATTACINI P, Nitrosi A, Giorgi Rossi P, Duffy SW, et al
    A Randomized Trial Comparing Breast Cancer Incidence and Interval Cancers after Tomosynthesis Plus Mammography versus Mammography Alone.
    Radiology. 2022 Feb 1:211132. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211132.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  12. GRIMM LJ, Rahbar H, Abdelmalak M, Hall AH, et al
    Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: State-of-the-Art Review.
    Radiology. 2022;302:246-255.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  13. KOPANS DB
    Time for Change in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Research.
    Radiology. 2022;302:293-294.
    PubMed    


    January 2022
  14. SHOSHAN Y, Bakalo R, Gilboa-Solomon F, Ratner V, et al
    Artificial Intelligence for Reducing Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Radiology. 2022 Jan 18:211105. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211105.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  15. PHILPOTTS LE
    Advancing Artificial Intelligence to Meet Breast Imaging Needs.
    Radiology. 2022 Jan 18:213101. doi: 10.1148/radiol.213101.
    PubMed    


  16. BERNSTEIN MH, Baird GL, Lourenco AP
    Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Recall and False-Positive Rates by Time of Day and Reader Experience.
    Radiology. 2022 Jan 11:210318. doi: 10.1148/radiol.210318.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  17. HOU R, Grimm LJ, Mazurowski MA, Marks JR, et al
    Prediction of Upstaging in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Based on Mammographic Radiomic Features.
    Radiology. 2022 Jan 4:210407. doi: 10.1148/radiol.210407.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    December 2021
  18. FUCHSJAGER MH, Adelsmayr G
    Artificial Intelligence as an Assistant in Breast Cancer Screening.
    Radiology. 2021 Dec 14:212675. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212675.
    PubMed    


  19. COZZI A, Magni V, Zanardo M, Schiaffino S, et al
    Contrast-enhanced Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance.
    Radiology. 2021 Dec 14:211412. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211412.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  20. ROMERO-MARTIN S, Elias-Cabot E, Raya-Povedano JL, Gubern-Merida A, et al
    Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation.
    Radiology. 2021 Dec 14:211590. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211590.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  21. LIANG A, Baraban E, Myers KS, Mullen LA, et al
    Developing Asymmetries without Sonographic Correlate at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Radiology. 2021 Dec 7:210527. doi: 10.1148/radiol.210527.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  22. GASTOUNIOTI A, Pantalone L, Scott CG, Cohen EA, et al
    Fully Automated Volumetric Breast Density Estimation from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Radiology. 2021;301:561-568.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  23. ZHU X, Wolfgruber TK, Leong L, Jensen M, et al
    Deep Learning Predicts Interval and Screening-detected Cancer from Screening Mammograms: A Case-Case-Control Study in 6369 Women.
    Radiology. 2021;301:550-558.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    November 2021
  24. FAN M, Cui Y, You C, Liu L, et al
    Radiogenomic Signatures of Oncotype DX Recurrence Score Enable Prediction of Survival in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Multicohort Study.
    Radiology. 2021 Nov 30:210738. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210738.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  25. TICE JA, Gard CC, Miglioretti DL, Sprague BL, et al
    Comparing Mammographic Density Assessed by Digital Breast Tomosynthesis or Digital Mammography: The Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Radiology. 2021 Nov 23:204579. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204579.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  26. MORI N, Mugikura S, Takase K
    Extra- or Peritumoral Hyperintensity on T2-weighted Images in Patients with Breast Cancer.
    Radiology. 2021 Nov 16:210939. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210939.
    PubMed    


  27. GEERTSE TD, Setz-Pels W, van der Waal D, Nederend J, et al
    Added Value of Prereading Screening Mammograms for Breast Cancer by Radiologic Technologists on Early Screening Outcomes.
    Radiology. 2021 Nov 9:210746. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210746.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  28. PISANO ED
    How Radiologists Can Improve Breast Cancer Screening.
    Radiology. 2021 Nov 9:211525. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021211525.
    PubMed    


    October 2021
  29. HELLER SL
    Impact of the Pandemic on Breast Cancer Diagnoses.
    Radiology. 2021 Oct 19:212477. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021212477.
    PubMed    


  30. HICKMAN SE, Woitek R, Le EPV, Im YR, et al
    Machine Learning for Workflow Applications in Screening Mammography: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Radiology. 2021 Oct 19:210391. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210391.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  31. LOWRY KP, Bissell M, Miglioretti DL, Kerlikowske K, et al
    Breast Biopsy Recommendations and Breast Cancers Diagnosed during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Radiology. 2021 Oct 19:211808. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021211808.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  32. MANKOFF DA, Sellmyer MA
    PET of Fibroblast-Activation Protein for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Staging.
    Radiology. 2021 Oct 12:212098. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021212098.
    PubMed    


  33. BACKHAUS P, Burg MC, Roll W, Buther F, et al
    Simultaneous FAPI PET/MRI Targeting the Fibroblast-Activation Protein for Breast Cancer.
    Radiology. 2021 Oct 12:204677. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204677.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  34. VERBURG E, van Gils CH, van der Velden BHM, Bakker MF, et al
    Deep Learning for Automated Triaging of 4581 Breast MRI Examinations from the DENSE Trial.
    Radiology. 2021 Oct 5:203960. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203960.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    September 2021
  35. BAE MS, Kim HG
    Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Using Deep Learning.
    Radiology. 2021 Sep 7:211446. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021211446.
    PubMed    


    August 2021
  36. ONISHI N, Li W, Newitt DC, Harnish RJ, et al
    Breast MRI during Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Lack of Background Parenchymal Enhancement Suppression and Inferior Treatment Response.
    Radiology. 2021 Aug 24:203645. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203645.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  37. IMBRIACO M
    Reducing False-Positive Screening MRI Rates in Women with Extremely Dense Breasts.
    Radiology. 2021 Aug 17:211547. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021211547.
    PubMed    


  38. DEN DEKKER BM, Bakker MF, de Lange SV, Veldhuis WB, et al
    Reducing False-Positive Screening MRI Rate in Women with Extremely Dense Breasts Using Prediction Models Based on Data from the DENSE Trial.
    Radiology. 2021 Aug 17:210325. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210325.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  39. CHOU SS, Romanoff J, Lehman CD, Khan SA, et al
    Preoperative Breast MRI for Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Imaging Features and Performance in a Multicenter Setting (ECOG-ACRIN E4112 Trial).
    Radiology. 2021 Aug 3:204743. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204743.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    July 2021
  40. LEE SH, Ryu HS, Jang MJ, Yi A, et al
    Glandular Tissue Component and Breast Cancer Risk in Mammographically Dense Breasts at Screening Breast US.
    Radiology. 2021 Jul 20:210367. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210367.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  41. BAE SJ, Cha YJ, Eun NL, Ji JH, et al
    Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonmass Enhancement at Breast MRI in Predicting Tumor Involvement of the Nipple: A Prospective Study in a Single Institution.
    Radiology. 2021 Jul 13:204136. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204136.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  42. CHAN HP, Helvie MA
    Using Single-View Wide-Angle DBT with AI for Breast Cancer Screening.
    Radiology. 2021 Jul 6:211203. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021211203.
    PubMed    


  43. PINTO MC, Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Pedersen K, Hofvind S, et al
    Impact of Artificial Intelligence Decision Support Using Deep Learning on Breast Cancer Screening Interpretation with Single-View Wide-Angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Radiology. 2021 Jul 6:204432. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204432.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    June 2021
  44. LEE CS, Moy L, Hughes D, Golden D, et al
    Radiologist Characteristics Associated with Interpretive Performance of Screening Mammography: A National Mammography Database (NMD) Study.
    Radiology. 2021 Jun 22:204379. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204379.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  45. SLANETZ PJ
    MRI Screening of Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
    Radiology. 2021 Jun 8:211080. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021211080.
    PubMed    


  46. KIM GR, Cho N, Kim SY, Han W, et al
    Interval Cancers after Negative Supplemental Screening Breast MRI Results in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
    Radiology. 2021 Jun 8:203074. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203074.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    May 2021
  47. CHANG JM
    MRI Screening Interval in Women with a History of Breast Cancer.
    Radiology. 2021 May 25:210836. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210836.
    PubMed    


  48. PARK VY, Kim MJ, Kim GR, Yoon JH, et al
    Outcomes Following Negative Screening MRI Results in Korean Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Implications for the Next MRI Interval.
    Radiology. 2021 May 25:204217. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204217.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  49. MOY L, Gao Y
    Digital Mammography Is Similar to Screen-Film Mammography for Women with Personal History of Breast Cancer.
    Radiology. 2021 May 18:210930. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210930.
    PubMed    


  50. LEE JM, Ichikawa LE, Wernli KJ, Bowles E, et al
    Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Performance in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer, 2007-2016.
    Radiology. 2021 May 18:204581. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204581.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  51. TAOUREL P
    Interval Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-based Screening: A Glimmer of Hope.
    Radiology. 2021 May 11:210179. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210179.
    PubMed    


  52. HOFVIND S, Moshina N, Holen AS, Danielsen AS, et al
    Interval and Subsequent Round Breast Cancer in a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screening.
    Radiology. 2021 May 11:203936. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203936.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  53. RAYA-POVEDANO JL, Romero-Martin S, Elias-Cabot E, Gubern-Merida A, et al
    AI-based Strategies to Reduce Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography and Tomosynthesis: A Retrospective Evaluation.
    Radiology. 2021 May 4:203555. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203555.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    April 2021
  54. BYON JH, Park YV, Yoon JH, Moon HJ, et al
    Added Value of MRI for Invasive Breast Cancer including the Entire Axilla for Evaluation of High-Level or Advanced Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in the Post-ACOSOG Z0011 Trial Era.
    Radiology. 2021 Apr 27:202683. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202683.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  55. PARK AR, Chae EY, Cha JH, Shin HJ, et al
    Preoperative Breast MRI in Women 35 Years of Age and Younger with Breast Cancer: Benefits in Surgical Outcomes by Using Propensity Score Analysis.
    Radiology. 2021 Apr 20:204124. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204124.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  56. MANN RM
    Tomosynthesis Is Taking Small Steps to Become the Standard for Breast Cancer Screening.
    Radiology. 2021 Apr 6:210153. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210153.
    PubMed    


  57. JOHNSON K, Lang K, Ikeda DM, Akesson A, et al
    Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Tumor Characteristics in the Prospective Population-based Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Radiology. 2021 Apr 6:204106. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204106.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    March 2021
  58. FEIG SA
    Influence of Patient Participation on Decreased Mortality from Screening Mammography.
    Radiology. 2021 Mar 30:210226. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210226.
    PubMed    


  59. LEE CS, Berg JM, Berg WA
    Cancer Yield Exceeds 2% for BI-RADS 3 Probably Benign Findings in Women Older Than 60 Years in the National Mammography Database.
    Radiology. 2021 Mar 30:204031. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204031.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  60. KIM SY, Cho N, Choi Y, Lee SH, et al
    Factors Affecting Pathologic Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Development and Validation of a Predictive Nomogram.
    Radiology. 2021 Mar 23:203871. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203871.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  61. MOY L, Gao Y
    Supplemental MRI in Extremely Dense Breasts: Sharp Reduction in False-Positive Rate in the Second Screening Round of the DENSE Trial.
    Radiology. 2021 Mar 16:210265. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210265.
    PubMed    


  62. VEENHUIZEN SGA, de Lange SV, Bakker MF, Pijnappel RM, et al
    Supplemental Breast MRI for Women with Extremely Dense Breasts: Results of the Second Screening Round of the DENSE Trial.
    Radiology. 2021 Mar 16:203633. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203633.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  63. DUFFY SW, Tabar L, Yen AM, Dean PB, et al
    Beneficial Effect of Consecutive Screening Mammography Examinations on Mortality from Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.
    Radiology. 2021 Mar 2:203935. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203935.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  64. JOCHELSON MS, Lobbes MBI
    Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art.
    Radiology. 2021 Mar 2:201948. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021201948.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    February 2021
  65. OZUTEMIZ C, Krystosek LA, Church AL, Chauhan A, et al
    Lymphadenopathy in COVID-19 Vaccine Recipients: Diagnostic Dilemma in Oncology Patients.
    Radiology. 2021 Feb 24:210275. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021210275.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  66. KWON MR, Choi JS, Won H, Ko EY, et al
    Breast Cancer Screening with Abbreviated Breast MRI: 3-year Outcome Analysis.
    Radiology. 2021 Feb 23:202927. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202927.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  67. ZARIC O, Farr A, Minarikova L, Lachner S, et al
    Tissue Sodium Concentration Quantification at 7.0-T MRI as an Early Marker for Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Study.
    Radiology. 2021 Feb 16:201600. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021201600.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  68. HARADA TL, Uematsu T, Nakashima K, Kawabata T, et al
    Evaluation of Breast Edema Findings at T2-weighted Breast MRI Is Useful for Diagnosing Occult Inflammatory Breast Cancer and Can Predict Prognosis after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Radiology. 2021 Feb 9:202604. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202604.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  69. HENDRICK RE, Helvie MA, Monticciolo DL
    Breast Cancer Mortality Rates Have Stopped Declining in U.S. Women Younger than 40 Years.
    Radiology. 2021 Feb 9:203476. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203476.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    January 2021
  70. RAHBAR H
    Closing the Chapter on Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening with US.
    Radiology. 2021 Jan 12:204334. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204334.
    PubMed    


  71. YI A, Jang MJ, Yim D, Kwon BR, et al
    Addition of Screening Breast US to Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk.
    Radiology. 2021 Jan 12:203134. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203134.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  72. BAE MS
    Sustainable Benefits of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening.
    Radiology. 2021;298:58-59.
    PubMed    


  73. EL KHOURY M, Maietta A, Tran A, Trop I, et al
    Case 285: Primary Breast Lymphoma.
    Radiology. 2021;298:231-236.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    December 2020
  74. BAHL M, Mercaldo S, McCarthy AM, Lehman CD, et al
    Imaging Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors with Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Radiology. 2020 Dec 22:201854. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201854.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  75. HOOLEY R, Butler R
    Digital Breast Tomosynthesis May Not Provide Optimal Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors.
    Radiology. 2020 Dec 22:204219. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020204219.
    PubMed    


  76. DURAND MA, Friedewald SM, Plecha DM, Copit DS, et al
    False-Negative Rates of Breast Cancer Screening with and without Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Radiology. 2020 Dec 1:202858. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202858.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  77. PUJARA AC, Joe AI, Patterson SK, Neal CH, et al
    Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Slab Thickness: Impact on Reader Performance and Interpretation Time.
    Radiology. 2020;297:534-542.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  78. SCHATTNER E
    High-Quality Mammography: A Step Forward for Women's Health.
    Radiology. 2020 Dec 1:204087. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020204087.
    PubMed    


    November 2020
  79. MCDONALD ES, Romanoff J, Rahbar H, Kitsch AE, et al
    Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Is a Sufficient Conventional Diffusion-weighted MRI Metric to Improve Breast MRI Diagnostic Performance: Results from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group A6702 Diffusion Imaging Trial.
    Radiology. 2020 Nov 17:202465. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202465.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  80. CAUMO F, Montemezzi S, Romanucci G, Brunelli S, et al
    Repeat Screening Outcomes with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Synthetic Mammography for Breast Cancer Detection: Results from the Prospective Verona Pilot Study.
    Radiology. 2020 Nov 10:201246. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201246.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    October 2020
  81. KOSMIN M, Padhani AR, Gogbashian A, Woolf D, et al
    Comparison of Whole-Body MRI, CT, and Bone Scintigraphy for Response Evaluation of Cancer Therapeutics in Metastatic Breast Cancer to Bone.
    Radiology. 2020 Oct 20:192683. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192683.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  82. JIANG Y, Edwards AV, Newstead GM
    Artificial Intelligence Applied to Breast MRI for Improved Diagnosis.
    Radiology. 2020 Oct 20:200292. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200292.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  83. ZUCKERMAN SP, Sprague BL, Weaver DL, Herschorn SD, et al
    Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
    Radiology. 2020 Oct 13:200240. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200240.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  84. LANG K
    Mounting Evidence for Synthetic Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening.
    Radiology. 2020 Oct 13:203716. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020203716.
    PubMed    


    September 2020
  85. MOSHINA N, Aase HS, Danielsen AS, Haldorsen IS, et al
    Comparing Screening Outcomes for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography by Automated Breast Density in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from the To-Be Trial.
    Radiology. 2020 Sep 15:201150. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201150.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  86. CHUNG M, Hayward JH, Woodard GA, Knobel A, et al
    US as the Primary Imaging Modality in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Masses in Breastfeeding Women, Including Those of Advanced Maternal Age.
    Radiology. 2020 Sep 1:201036. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201036.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    August 2020
  87. MCKAY JA, Church AL, Rubin N, Emory TH, et al
    A Comparison of Methods for High-Spatial-Resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Breast MRI.
    Radiology. 2020 Aug 25:200221. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200221.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    July 2020
  88. BROWN AL, Wahab RA
    MRI of Primary Angiosarcoma of the Breast.
    Radiology. 2020 Jul 28:201377. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201377.
    PubMed    


  89. SALIM M, Dembrower K, Eklund M, Lindholm P, et al
    Range of Radiologist Performance in a Population-based Screening Cohort of 1 Million Digital Mammography Examinations.
    Radiology. 2020 Jul 28:192212. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192212.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  90. MOY L
    BI-RADS Category 3 Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Biopsy or Surgical Excision.
    Radiology. 2020;296:42-43.
    PubMed    


    May 2020
  91. BERG WA, Berg JM, Sickles EA, Burnside ES, et al
    Cancer Yield and Patterns of Follow-up for BI-RADS Category 3 after Screening Mammography Recall in the National Mammography Database.
    Radiology. 2020 May 19:192641. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192641.
    PubMed     Abstract available


Thank you for your interest in scientific medicine.


AMEDEO Breast Cancer is free of charge.
This policy is made possible thanks to a media sponsorship by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Design: