Home The Word Brain	My Amedeo FAQ Privacy About
	Amedeo Chinese For Medical Students & Physicians A complete 20-lesson, 300-page Chinese course with a companion app in 21 languages — free forever. Download the free PDF: Amedeo Chinese PDF

Dental Implants

Free Subscription 17.08.2026 1 ACS Biomater Sci Eng 1 Am J Dent 1 Ann Med Surg (Lond) 1 Arch Oral Biol 3 BMC Oral Health 1 Br Dent J 1 Discov Nano 1 Front Public Health 1 Healthcare (Basel) 1 Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 1 Int J Mol Sci 1 Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1 J Craniofac Surg 1 J Dent 2 J Esthet Restor Dent 1 J Indian Soc Periodontol 28 J Prosthet Dent 5 J Prosthodont 1 J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 1 Rev Bras Epidemiol 1 Small 2 Stomatologiia (Mosk)

Retrieve available abstracts of this week’s articles: HTML format

Single Articles

ACS Biomater Sci Eng

1. CHEN H, Wang R, Wang S, Zheng X, et al
   Enhanced Biological Performance of Fractal Geometry Design on Titanium for Dental Implant Application: An In Vitro Study.
   ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2026;12:4236-4248.
   PubMed         Abstract available
   
   

   
   Am J Dent

2. SHEN M, Feng Y, Peng X, Chen Y, et al
   Perioperative nursing based on the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice theory in patients undergoing robot-assisted dental implant surgery.
   Am J Dent. 2026;39:206-210.
   PubMed         Abstract available
   
   

   
   Ann Med Surg (Lond)

3. ALBASH Z, Kashkash W, Alexandrovich ZI, Hachem HA, et al
   Dental implant rehabilitation after jaw tumor resection: a mini-review of protocols and quality of life across treatment modalities.
   Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2026;88:5137-5145.
   PubMed         Abstract available
   
   

   
   Arch Oral Biol

4. DESPAROIS L, Chevallier P, Mantovani D, Houde VP, et al
   Manual polishing of Ti6Al4V produces minimal changes in oral bacterial adhesion and osteogenic cell behavior.
   Arch Oral Biol. 2026;190:106690.
   PubMed         Abstract available
   
   

   
   BMC Oral Health

5. DERE KA, Findik Y
   Comparison of biomechanical performance of custom implants with different designs under functional load: a finite element analysis.
   BMC Oral Health. 2026;26:1417.
   PubMed         Abstract available
   
   
6. ETIK E, Keskin Yalcin B
   Biomechanical comparison of titanium and Y-TZP subperiosteal implants in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study.
   BMC Oral Health. 2026;26:1412.
   PubMed         Abstract available
   
   
7. KELES M, Yuksel IB
   Fractal analysis of bone architecture changes following transcrestal sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement.
   BMC Oral Health. 2026;26:1425.
   PubMed         Abstract available
   
   

   
   Br Dent J

8. HANSRANI V, Exarchos E, Choi J, Liao P, et al
   Automating surgical guide design for single anterior implants powered by artificial intelligence - a clinical report.
   Br Dent J. 2026;241:169-173.
   PubMed         Abstract available
   
   

   
   Discov Nano

9. OHTAKE T, Shikanai H, Yamada M, Watanabe J, et al
   Anisotropic nanospikes on micro and nanoscale hierarchical titanium surfaces enhance early osseointegration of dental implants.
   Discov Nano. 2026;21:393.
   PubMed         Abstract available
   
   

   
   Front Public Health

10. ZHANG Y, Nie S, Ren X
    Perioperative pain-anxiety response profiles and their predictors in patients undergoing dental implant surgery: a latent profile analysis.
    Front Public Health. 2026;14:1885978.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

    
    Healthcare (Basel)

11. OZDEMIR A, Sevimay MA, Karakas E
    Patient Expectations and Dentists' Perceptions of Those Expectations in Dental Implant Therapy: A Mirror-Design Study.
    Healthcare (Basel). 2026;14:2268.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

    
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi

12. YU H, Zhan M, Xie C, Sun M, et al
    [Geometric analysis of three-dimensional position blocking in implant surgery: clinical decision making of instrument length and implant guidance methods].
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2026;44:561-571.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

    
    Int J Mol Sci

13. LIU X, Chen Z, Yang L, Ma W, et al
    Alogliptin Enhances Implant Osseointegration in Diabetes Through an Osteogenic-Angiogenic Immunomodulatory Procedure.
    Int J Mol Sci. 2026;27:6800.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

    
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg

14. DALBAND M, Seyfi S, Behnia H, Tabrizi R, et al
    Comparison of the long-term survival rates of dental implants in onlay versus interpositional bone grafts for augmentation of the atrophic mandibular ridge.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2026 Aug 14:S0901-5027(26)00339.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

    
    J Craniofac Surg

15. AKRAM WA, Bede SY
    The Effect of Osseodensification and Conventional Implant Site Preparation on Implant Stability of Tapered and Cylindrical Dental Implants: A Randomized Controlled Study.
    J Craniofac Surg. 2026 Aug 13. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000013252.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

    
    J Dent

16. BREMER MK, Hoffmann NP, Schmalbach B, Abou-Ayash S, et al
    Radiological differentiation of original and generic dental implants using a multiclass AI model in comparison with human expertise: an in vitro study.
    J Dent. 2026 Aug 9:106945. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2026.106945.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

    
    J Esthet Restor Dent

17. GALLUCCI GO, Tavelli L, Buser D, Pedrinaci I, et al
    Dual-Hybrid Treatment Approach for Peri-Implant Hard and Soft Tissue Stability.
    J Esthet Restor Dent. 2026;38:1655-1664.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
18. KIM YK, Komar A, Su H, Monje A, et al
    Peri-Implant Supracrestal Resiliency (PSR): A Geometric Determinant Guiding Emergence Profile Execution.
    J Esthet Restor Dent. 2026;38:1638-1646.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

    
    J Indian Soc Periodontol

19. MEIKANDAN GN, Jayachandran D, Jayaprakash G, Saranyan R, et al
    Analysis of stress distribution around conventional and basal dental implants in the posterior mandible: A finite element study.
    J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2026;30:309-313.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

    
    J Prosthet Dent

20. ALAWAWDA O, Yesil Z, Sakarya RE, Haoran MA, et al
    Trueness of complete arch intraoral implant scans using splinted and non-splinted scan bodies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e104-e114.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
21. SHEIKH MS, Shetty N, Kumar P, Nooji D, et al
    Prosthodontic rehabilitation using a patient-specific implant in an anterior maxilla with severe alveolar bone deficiency: A clinical report.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e5-e9.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
22. FAN L, Xie C, Sun M, Zhan M, et al
    A digital technique for recording and assessing mouth opening based on intraoral scanning.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e36-e39.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
23. REVILLA-LEON M, Cascos R, Barmak AB, Kois JC, et al
    Accuracy of intraoral photogrammetry and influence of calibrated implant scan body dimensions.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:577-583.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
24. MORASCHINI V, da Silveira JT Junior, Filho WPA, Velloso G, et al
    Accuracy of horizontal scan bodies and auxiliary geometric stabilization strategies for complete arch digital implant scans: A systematic review.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e148-e154.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
25. ALZOUBI FM, Altemimi A, Nogueira LP, Yilmaz B, et al
    Microcomputed tomography analysis of marginal adaptation and internal fit of zirconia frameworks with direct-to-abutment connections using a deep learning artificial intelligence model.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e216-e227.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
26. WU Z, Li S, Zhang Y, Jiang X, et al
    Quantitative analysis with a digital registration method of three-dimensional implant placement accuracy by novice operators using freehand surgery: An in vitro study.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e195-e204.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
27. KAMALAKIDIS SN, Stratos A, Niakou A, Moutsios A, et al
    Combining conventional and digital technologies in immediate mandibular implant overdenture fabrication: A dental technique.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e50-e53.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
28. VERISSIMO MHG, de Freitas RFCP, Dos Santos ALM, de Sa GSP, et al
    Accuracy evaluation of dual-function scan body for recording complete arch implant-supported prostheses.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e268-e276.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
29. KURULTAY Z, Sakarya RE
    Comparison of mechanical properties of implant-supported prostheses fabricated with different materials and abutments: An in vitro study.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e251-e259.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
30. YESIL KURT IB, Li P, Spintzyk S, Diken Turksayar AA, et al
    Evaluation of fracture strength and failure mode of zirconia molar implant abutments manufactured with additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e235-e242.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
31. QUISPILAYA EC, Marroquin-Soto C, Padilla-Avalos CA
    Analog emergence profile conditioning after simultaneous hard- and soft-tissue augmentation: A 5-year clinical report.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e15-e20.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
32. HUANG YF, Wei FC, Liao YF, Chang YM, et al
    Effect of fibula length on peri-implant resorption after segmental mandibulectomy of ameloblastoma and dental rehabilitation.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e435-e440.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
33. KOHANSAL S, Farahmand F, Parhiz A, Karimpour M, et al
    Osseointegration dynamics of mandibular patient-specific implants: A mechanoregulation-based finite element study.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e205-e215.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
34. TEKELI SIMSEK A, Gungor MA, Celikkol O, Yildirim B, et al
    Stress distribution of different attachment systems in mandibular implant overdentures: A 3D finite element study.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e277-e286.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
35. STRATOS A, Niakou A, Rodiou S, Moutsios A, et al
    Effect of implant number and spatial configuration on reverse torque values of screw-retained restorations after mechanical aging: An in vitro study.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e228-e234.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
36. GUO Z, Wu D, Meng D, Wang X, et al
    Reconstruction of emergence profile using a digital mirroring technique in a custom biological definitive abutment and interim restoration in immediate implant placement in esthetic area: A clinical report with 4-year follow-up.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e10-e14.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
37. REVILLA-LEON M, Gomez-Polo M, Barmak AB, Kois JC, et al
    Accuracy of implant scans recorded using tablet-based photogrammetry and noncalibrated implant scan body systems.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:570-576.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
38. A JF, S P, E R, Livingstone D, et al
    Retrieval of a damaged abutment screw head using autopolymerizing acrylic resin: A dental technique.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e84-e86.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
39. CALAZANS NETO JV, Libera JD, Souza JGS, Nagay BE, et al
    Alignment of artificial intelligence-generated responses with systematic reviews in implant prosthodontics.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:523-531.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
40. RUGGIERO G, Sorrentino R, Lepidi L, Mijiritsky E, et al
    Combining custom retraction, fiducial markers, and splinted implant scan bodies for mandibular complete arch implant scanning: A dental technique.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:345-348.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
41. REVILLA-LEON M, Cascos R, Barmak AB, Kois JC, et al
    Clinical evaluation of complete arch implant scanning accuracy recorded using an app-based photogrammetry and noncalibrated scan body system.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:458-465.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
42. LEE DH, Park K, Riera C, Lee JD, et al
    Impact of scan body geometry and library file modifications on matching between intraoral implant scans and library files.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e260-e267.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
43. MOSADDAD SA, Jalili A, Gonzalez-Alvarez M, Pelaez J, et al
    Use of a universal non-calibrated auxiliary geometric device for complete arch implant scanning.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e44-e49.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
44. TAKEDA TTS, Borges MHR, Malheiros SS, Costa RC, et al
    Effect of probiotics on oral biofilm formation on titanium and SLA implant surfaces: An in vitro and in situ study.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:532-542.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
45. NASSANI LM, Hammoudeh HS, Lang LA, Saponaro PC, et al
    Effect of different medications on implant complications and success rate: A retrospective study.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:466-478.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
46. YILMAZ B, Cevik P, Kahveci C, Abou-Ayash S, et al
    Effect of scanned arch, level of recording, and recording technique for trueness and marginal fit of complete arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:543-551.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
47. GALVAO CS, Moreira FSR, de Medeiros AKB, Cakmak G, et al
    Optimizing complete arch implant digital scans: Influence of scan body height, scanner type, and implant location on directional deviations.
    J Prosthet Dent. 2026;136:e308-e316.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

    
    J Prosthodont

48. ALKIMAVICIUS J, Rathi M, Linkeviciute U, Linkeviciene L, et al
    The influence of implant placement depth on peri-implant tissues in immediate implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial with 1-year follow-up.
    J Prosthodont. 2026;35:1008-1020.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
49. LEELALUK S, Hammoudeh H, Kongkiatkamon S, Wu TH, et al
    Acceptability, deviation, and efficiency of automated artificial intelligence-based implant planning methods: A comparison with human intelligence.
    J Prosthodont. 2026;35:1038-1045.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
50. XIANG Y, Yang Y, Sun Y, Taylor TD, et al
    Osseointegrated implant labial displacement with no mobility in maxillary anterior region: A clinical report.
    J Prosthodont. 2026;35:981-987.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
51. FADL BT, El-Attar MSI, Mesquita AMM, Elhadary A, et al
    Improving full-arch implant scanning accuracy with a Meccano-like device for scan bodies splinting: A dental technique.
    J Prosthodont. 2026;35:1158-1163.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
52. GUNGOR ERDOGAN H, Keles M, Yilmaz B
    Comparison of stress distribution around splinted and nonsplinted implants with different crown height space in posterior mandible: A finite element analysis study.
    J Prosthodont. 2026;35:1124-1133.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

    
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B

53. LI C, Cheng K, Yu C, Wang R, et al
    A novel drill-milling technology for robot-assisted implant osteotomy preparation: simulation and an ex vivovalidation study.
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2026;27:906-917.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

    
    Rev Bras Epidemiol

54. CRUZ GSD, Schmidt LS, Bauer YG, Muniz FWMG, et al
    Prevalence and associated factors of dental implant use in adults and older adults according to self-report and clinical examination: population-based study, SB Brasil 2023.
    Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2026;29.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

    
    Small

55. YU C, Wang Y, Zheng D, Zhang R, et al
    Biomimetic Dental Implant With Programmed Surface Platform for Enhanced Interfacial Osseointegration via Sequentially Regulating Bone Regeneration With Switchable Immunomodulatory and Antibacterial Properties.
    Small. 2026 Aug 11:e75054. doi: 10.1002/smll.75054.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

    
    Stomatologiia (Mosk)

56. KUDZAEV BA, Badalyan VA, Chernovol EM
    [The values of torque and primary stability of different types of dental implants depending on drill design].
    Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2026;105:11-18.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    
57. KAMALYAN AV
    [Possibilities of using dental implants for personal identification in forensic medical practice].
    Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2026;105:78-81.
    PubMed         Abstract available
    
    

Thank you for your interest in scientific medicine.

AMEDEO Dental Implants is free of charge. Privacy / Datenschutzerklärung | Imprint / Impressum