Home The Word Brain My Amedeo FAQ Privacy About Flying Publisher   


COVID-19: Daily Top 10 Papers


  Ophthalmology

  Free Subscription


Articles published in Ophthalmic Physiol Opt

Retrieve available abstracts of 119 articles:
HTML format



Single Articles


    March 2021
  1. NAGRA M, Allen PM, Norgett Y, Beukes E, et al
    The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on working practices of UK primary care optometrists.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41:378-392.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  2. PATEL A, Fothergill AS, Barnard KEC, Dunbar H, et al
    Lockdown low vision assessment: an audit of 500 telephone-based modified low vision consultations.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41:295-300.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    January 2021
  3. JACKSON J, Silvestri G, Stevenson M, Sinton J, et al
    COVID-19: The regional impact of COVID-19 on the certification of vision impairment in Northern Ireland.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41:136-143.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    January 2020
  4. ALMUTAIRI MS, Altoaimi BH, Bradley A
    Impact of monovision on dynamic accommodation of early presbyopes.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020;40:47-59.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  5. JONES PR, Tigchelaar I, Demaria G, Wilson I, et al
    Refinement and preliminary evaluation of two tablet-based tests of real-world visual function.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020;40:35-46.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  6. MCCORMICK I, Mactaggart I, Bastawrous A, Burton MJ, et al
    Effective refractive error coverage: an eye health indicator to measure progress towards universal health coverage.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020;40:1-5.
    PubMed    


  7. TURNBULL PRK, Goodman LK, Phillips JR
    Global-flash mfERG responses to local differences in spherical and astigmatic defocus across the human retina.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020;40:24-34.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  8. NABOVATI P, Kamali M, Mirzajani A, Jafarzadehpur E, et al
    The effect of base-in prism on vision-related symptoms and clinical characteristics of young adults with convergence insufficiency; a placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020;40:8-16.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    November 2019
  9. ROZEMA JJ, Sun W, Wu JF, Jiang WJ, et al
    Differences in ocular biometry between urban and rural children matched by refractive error: the Shandong Children Eye Study.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:451-458.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  10. CROSSLAND MD, Starke SD, Imielski P, Wolffsohn JS, et al
    Benefit of an electronic head-mounted low vision aid.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:422-431.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  11. SCHAKEL W, Bode C, Elsman EBM, van der Aa HPA, et al
    The association between visual impairment and fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:399-413.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  12. CREER RC, Roberts SA, Aslam TM, Balaskas K, et al
    Treatment decisions of UK hospital optometrists and ophthalmologists in patients with nAMD: a vignette study.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:432-440.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  13. YANAGISAWA M, Murata H, Matsuura M, Fujino Y, et al
    Investigating the structure-function relationship using Goldmann V standard automated perimetry where glaucomatous damage is advanced.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:441-450.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    September 2019
  14. MCGRAW PV, Barrett BT, Ledgeway T
    Optical treatment of strabismic amblyopia.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:309-312.
    PubMed    


  15. JAISANKAR D, Leube A, Gifford KL, Schmid KL, et al
    Effects of eye rotation and contact lens decentration on horizontal peripheral refraction.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:370-377.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  16. ELSMAN EBM, van Nispen RMA, van Rens GHMB
    Psychometric evaluation of a new proxy-instrument to assess participation in children aged 3-6 years with visual impairment: PAI-CY 3-6.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:378-391.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  17. LOPEZ-DE LA ROSA A, Alghamdi WM, Kunnen CM, Lazon de la Jara P, et al
    Changes in the tarsal conjunctiva viewed by in vivo confocal microscopy are associated with ocular symptoms and contact lens wear.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:328-336.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  18. BLACK AA, Wood JM, Colorado LH, Collins MJ, et al
    The impact of uncorrected astigmatism on night driving performance.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:350-357.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    July 2019
  19. TIDEMAN JWL, Polling JR, Jaddoe VWV, Vingerling JR, et al
    Growth in foetal life, infancy, and early childhood and the association with ocular biometry.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:245-252.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  20. ZHANG X, Wang J, Li Y, Jiang B, et al
    Diagnostic test accuracy of Spot and Plusoptix photoscreeners in detecting amblyogenic risk factors in children: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:260-271.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  21. GHAHGHAEI S, Reed O, Candy TR, Chandna A, et al
    Calibration of the PlusOptix PowerRef 3 with change in viewing distance, adult age and refractive error.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:253-259.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  22. DOHERTY SE, Doyle LA, McCullough SJ, Saunders KJ, et al
    Comparison of retinoscopy results with and without 1% cyclopentolate in school-aged children.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:272-281.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  23. SANKARIDURG P, Bakaraju RC, Naduvilath T, Chen X, et al
    Myopia control with novel central and peripheral plus contact lenses and extended depth of focus contact lenses: 2 year results from a randomised clinical trial.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:294-307.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  24. THIBOS LN
    Calculation of the geometrical point-spread function from wavefront aberrations.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:232-244.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  25. LIU S, Ye S, Xi W, Zhang X, et al
    Electronic devices and myopic refraction among children aged 6-14 years in urban areas of Tianjin, China.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:282-293.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    March 2019
  26. CHOPIN A, Bavelier D, Levi DM
    The prevalence and diagnosis of 'stereoblindness' in adults less than 60 years of age: a best evidence synthesis.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:66-85.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  27. CARKEET A, Chang YA, Chang TY, Chen PM, et al
    Simulated image doubling and visual acuity: effects of doubling magnitude, orientation, and ghost image intensity.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:86-93.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  28. MACNAUGHTON J, Latham K, Vianya-Estopa M
    Rehabilitation needs and activity limitations of adults with a visual impairment entering a low vision rehabilitation service in England.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:113-126.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  29. WOOG K, Legras R
    Distribution of mid-peripheral cones in emmetropic and myopic subjects using adaptive optics flood illumination camera.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:94-103.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  30. ANNOH R, Loo CY, Hogan B, Tan HL, et al
    Accuracy of detection of patients with narrow angles by community optometrists in Scotland.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:104-112.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    January 2019
  31. WEBBER AL, Wood JM, Thompson B, Birch EE, et al
    From suppression to stereoacuity: a composite binocular function score for clinical research.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:53-62.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  32. PLOTNIKOV D, Guggenheim JA
    Mendelian randomisation and the goal of inferring causation from observational studies in the vision sciences.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:11-25.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  33. ZIMMERMAN DR, Shneor E, Millodot M, Gordon-Shaag A, et al
    Corneal and conjunctival injury seen in urgent care centres in Israel.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:46-52.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  34. FARIA-RIBEIRO M, Gonzalez-Meijome JM
    Multifocal contact lenses: towards customisation?
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:37-45.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  35. SWANSON WH, King BJ
    Comparison of defect depths for sinusoidal and circular perimetric stimuli in patients with glaucoma.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:26-36.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  36. CHARMAN WN
    Pinholes and presbyopia: solution or sideshow?
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:1-10.
    PubMed    


    November 2018
  37. NIVISON-SMITH L, Milston R, Chiang J, Ly A, et al
    Peripheral retinal findings in populations with macular disease are similar to healthy eyes.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:584-595.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  38. QUINN NB, Chakravarthy U, Muldrew KA, Hamill B, et al
    Confocal infrared imaging with optical coherence tomography provides superior detection of a number of common macular lesions compared to colour fundus photography.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:574-583.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  39. FIDALGO BR, Jindal A, Tyler CW, Ctori I, et al
    Development and validation of a new glaucoma screening test using temporally modulated flicker.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:617-628.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  40. BRUCE G, Tatham AJ
    Glaucoma management in primary care: barriers perceived by optometrists in Scotland.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:629-639.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  41. CONSEJO A, Behaegel J, Van Hoey M, Iskander DR, et al
    Scleral asymmetry as a potential predictor for scleral lens compression.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:609-616.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    September 2018
  42. THOMPSON B
    Visualisation of the visual system.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:474-476.
    PubMed    


  43. LARCOMBE SJ, Kulyomina Y, Antonova N, Ajina S, et al
    Visual training in hemianopia alters neural activity in the absence of behavioural improvement: a pilot study.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:538-549.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  44. OSTRIN LA
    The ipRGC-driven pupil response with light exposure and refractive error in children.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:503-515.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  45. WOOD JM, Black AA, Hopkins S, White SLJ, et al
    Vision and academic performance in primary school children.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:516-524.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  46. ALBERTI CF, Bex PJ
    Binocular contrast summation and inhibition depends on spatial frequency, eccentricity and binocular disparity.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:525-537.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  47. GHORBANI MOJARRAD N, Williams C, Guggenheim JA
    A genetic risk score and number of myopic parents independently predict myopia.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:492-502.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  48. PARKINS DJ, Benwell MJ, Edgar DF, Evans BJW, et al
    The relationship between unwarranted variation in optometric referrals and time since qualification.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:550-561.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  49. ARTHUR E, Papay JA, Haggerty BP, Clark CA, et al
    Subtle changes in diabetic retinas localised in 3D using OCT.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:477-491.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  50. BAJAJ R, Ramulu P, Dillon L, Jakobsen KB, et al
    Validating the accuracy of an activity monitor in a visually impaired older population.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:562-569.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    July 2018
  51. BEDGGOOD P, Tanabe F, McKendrick AM, Turpin A, et al
    Optic nerve tissue displacement during mild intraocular pressure elevation: its relationship to central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:389-399.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  52. DUNCAN EM, Cassie H, Pooley J, Elouafakoui P, et al
    Areas for improvement in community optometry: flashes and floaters take priority.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:411-421.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  53. IRVING EL, Sivak AM, Spafford MM
    "I can see fine": patient knowledge of eye care.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:422-431.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  54. WU Y, Thibos LN, Candy TR
    Two-dimensional simulation of eccentric photorefraction images for ametropes: factors influencing the measurement.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:432-446.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  55. DILLON L, Clemson L, Ramulu P, Sherrington C, et al
    A systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise-based falls prevention strategies in adults aged 50+ years with visual impairment.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:456-467.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  56. ASHIMATEY BS, King BJ, Burns SA, Swanson WH, et al
    Evaluating glaucomatous abnormality in peripapillary optical coherence tomography enface visualisation of the retinal nerve fibre layer reflectance.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:376-388.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  57. HASHEMI H, Heydarian S, Yekta A, Ostadimoghaddam H, et al
    High prevalence and familial aggregation of keratoconus in an Iranian rural population: a population-based study.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:447-455.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  58. BARRETT C, O'Brien C, Loughman J
    Glaucoma referral refinement in Ireland: managing the sensitivity-specificity paradox in optometric practice.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:400-410.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    May 2018
  59. LIN C, Li SM, Ohno-Matsui K, Wang BS, et al
    Five-year incidence and progression of myopic maculopathy in a rural Chinese adult population: the Handan Eye Study.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:337-345.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  60. JI Q, Yoo YS, Alam H, Yoon G, et al
    Through-focus optical characteristics of monofocal and bifocal soft contact lenses across the peripheral visual field.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:326-336.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  61. CRUICKSHANK FE, Logan NS
    Optical 'dampening' of the refractive error to axial length ratio: implications for outcome measures in myopia control studies.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:290-297.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  62. CHAKRABORTY R, Ostrin LA, Nickla DL, Iuvone PM, et al
    Circadian rhythms, refractive development, and myopia.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:217-245.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  63. HIRAOKA T, Sekine Y, Okamoto F, Mihashi T, et al
    Safety and efficacy following 10-years of overnight orthokeratology for myopia control.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:281-289.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  64. SCHAEFFEL F
    All about restraining eye growth: the 16th International Myopia Conference in Birmingham, UK.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:210-214.
    PubMed    


  65. LEVY AM, Fazio MA, Grytz R
    Experimental myopia increases and scleral crosslinking using genipin inhibits cyclic softening in the tree shrew sclera.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:246-256.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  66. LOGAN N, Guggenheim J, To CH
    Myopia: mechanisms, manifestations and management.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:207-209.
    PubMed    


  67. SANDER BP, Collins MJ, Read SA
    The interaction between homatropine and optical blur on choroidal thickness.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:257-265.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  68. LOGAN N
    Conference Report: The 16th International Myopia Conference.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:215-216.
    PubMed    


  69. MCCRANN S, Flitcroft I, Lalor K, Butler J, et al
    Parental attitudes to myopia: a key agent of change for myopia control?
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:298-308.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  70. CHEN Z, Song Y, Li M, Chen W, et al
    Schlemm's canal and trabecular meshwork morphology in high myopia.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:266-272.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  71. JOSEPH S, Krishnan T, Ravindran RD, Maraini G, et al
    Prevalence and risk factors for myopia and other refractive errors in an adult population in southern India.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:346-358.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  72. FARIA-RIBEIRO M, Amorim-de-Sousa A, Gonzalez-Meijome JM
    Predicted accommodative response from image quality in young eyes fitted with different dual-focus designs.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:309-316.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  73. CARMICHAEL MARTINS A, Vohnsen B
    Analysing the impact of myopia on the Stiles-Crawford effect of the first kind using a digital micromirror device.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:273-280.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  74. BARBERO S, Faria-Ribeiro M
    Foveal vision power errors induced by spectacle lenses designed to correct peripheral refractive errors.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:317-325.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    March 2018
  75. GOBEILLE M, Malkin A, Jamara R, Ross NC, et al
    Clinical outcomes of low vision rehabilitation delivered by a mobile clinic.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:193-202.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  76. KEAY L, Palagyi A
    Preventing falls in older people with cataract - it is not just about surgery.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:117-118.
    PubMed    


  77. EVANS BJW, Allen PM
    Coloured filters and visual stress.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:203-204.
    PubMed    


  78. BOWES OMB, Shah P, Rana M, Farrell S, et al
    Quality indicators in a community optometrist led cataract shared care scheme.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:183-192.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  79. GAO TY, Anstice N, Babu RJ, Black JM, et al
    Optical treatment of amblyopia in older children and adults is essential prior to enrolment in a clinical trial.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:129-143.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  80. ALTOAIMI BH, Kollbaum P, Meyer D, Bradley A, et al
    Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:152-163.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  81. ALLUWIMI MS, Swanson WH, Malinovsky VE, King BJ, et al
    A basis for customising perimetric locations within the macula in glaucoma.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:164-173.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  82. ANDERSON AJ, Asokan R, Murata H, Asaoka R, et al
    Detecting glaucomatous progression with infrequent visual field testing.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:174-182.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    January 2018
  83. VAN DEN BERG TJTP
    Intraocular light scatter, reflections, fluorescence and absorption: what we see in the slit lamp.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:6-25.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  84. ALMUTLEB ES, Bradley A, Jedlicka J, Hassan SE, et al
    Simulation of a central scotoma using contact lenses with an opaque centre.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:76-87.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  85. PAN CW, Qiu QX, Qian DJ, Hu DN, et al
    Iris colour in relation to myopia among Chinese school-aged children.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:48-55.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  86. LEAT SJ, Zecevic AA, Keeling A, Hileeto D, et al
    Prevalence of vision loss among hospital in-patients; a risk factor for falls?
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:106-114.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  87. XU R, Kollbaum P, Thibos L, Lopez-Gil N, et al
    Reducing starbursts in highly aberrated eyes with pupil miosis.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:26-36.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  88. TARITA-NISTOR L, Gonzalez EG, Mandelcorn MS, Brent MH, et al
    The reading accessibility index and quality of reading grid of patients with central vision loss.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:88-97.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  89. ASHIMATEY BS, King BJ, Swanson WH
    Retinal putative glial alterations: implication for glaucoma care.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:56-65.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  90. TAYLOR DJ, Edwards LA, Binns AM, Crabb DP, et al
    Seeing it differently: self-reported description of vision loss in dry age-related macular degeneration.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:98-105.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  91. LENTSCH MJ, Marsack JD, Anderson HA
    Objective measurement of spectacle wear with a temperature sensor data logger.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38:37-47.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    November 2017
  92. LAWRENSON JG, Hull CC, Downie LE
    The effect of blue-light blocking spectacle lenses on visual performance, macular health and the sleep-wake cycle: a systematic review of the literature.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:644-654.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  93. LY A, Nivison-Smith L, Hennessy M, Kalloniatis M, et al
    The advantages of intermediate-tier, inter-optometric referral of low risk pigmented lesions.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:661-668.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  94. CHARMAN WN
    Virtual Issue Editorial: Presbyopia - grappling with an age-old problem.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:655-660.
    PubMed    


  95. ELLIOT DB, Wood JM
    Coloured filters show gender differences and poor repeatability.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:635-639.
    PubMed    


  96. DOWNIE LE
    Blue-light filtering ophthalmic lenses: to prescribe, or not to prescribe?
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:640-643.
    PubMed    


  97. LITTLE JA, McClelland J, Saunders K
    Child Vision Research Society conference report.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:671-672.
    PubMed    


    September 2017
  98. WESSELINK C, Jansonius NM
    Glaucoma progression detection with frequency doubling technology (FDT) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:594-601.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  99. DE GRACIA P, Hartwig A
    Optimal orientation for angularly segmented multifocal corrections.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:610-623.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  100. IRVING EL, Yakobchuk-Stanger C
    Myopia progression control lens reverses induced myopia in chicks.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:576-584.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  101. KEARNEY S, O'Donoghue L, Pourshahidi LK, Cobice D, et al
    Myopes have significantly higher serum melatonin concentrations than non-myopes.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:557-567.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  102. BERNAL-MOLINA P, Marin-Franch I, Del Aguila-Carrasco AJ, Esteve-Taboada JJ, et al
    Human eyes do not need monochromatic aberrations for dynamic accommodation.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:602-609.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  103. CHOI KY, Yu WY, Lam CHI, Li ZC, et al
    Childhood exposure to constricted living space: a possible environmental threat for myopia development.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:568-575.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  104. GUGGENHEIM JA, Ghorbani Mojarrad N, Williams C, Flitcroft DI, et al
    Genetic prediction of myopia: prospects and challenges.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:549-556.
    PubMed    


  105. SCHACHAR RA, Kamangar F
    Sclera does not change its shape during accommodation.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:624-625.
    PubMed    


    July 2017
  106. VINUELA-NAVARRO V, Erichsen JT, Williams C, Woodhouse JM, et al
    Saccades and fixations in children with delayed reading skills.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:531-541.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  107. SIDEROUDI H, Labiris G, Georgantzoglou K, Ntonti P, et al
    Fourier analysis algorithm for the posterior corneal keratometric data: clinical usefulness in keratoconus.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:460-466.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  108. PAUDEL N, Jacobs RJ, Sloan R, Denny S, et al
    Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:521-530.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  109. HARRISON WW, Putnam NM, Shukis C, Nguyen E, et al
    The corneal nerve density in the sub-basal plexus decreases with increasing myopia: a pilot study.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:482-488.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  110. SUTTLE CM, Barbur J, Conway ML
    Coloured overlays and precision-tinted lenses: poor repeatability in a sample of adults diagnosed with visual stress.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:542-548.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  111. HEESTERBEEK TJ, van der Aa HPA, van Rens GHMB, Twisk JWR, et al
    The incidence and predictors of depressive and anxiety symptoms in older adults with vision impairment: a longitudinal prospective cohort study.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:385-398.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  112. LIN Z, Vasudevan B, Ciuffreda KJ, Zhou HJ, et al
    The difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction and its association with progression of refractive error in Beijing urban children.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:489-497.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  113. BRAY C, Britton S, Yeung D, Haines L, et al
    Change in over-refraction after scleral lens settling on average corneas.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:467-472.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  114. TAYLOR JJ, Bambrick R, Brand A, Bray N, et al
    Effectiveness of portable electronic and optical magnifiers for near vision activities in low vision: a randomised crossover trial.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:370-384.
    PubMed     Abstract available


  115. PRICE DA, Swanson WH, Horner DG
    Using perimetric data to estimate ganglion cell loss for detecting progression of glaucoma: a comparison of models.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:409-419.
    PubMed     Abstract available


    May 2017
  116. ROZEMA JJ, Charman WN, Atchison DA, Ginis H, et al
    Visual and Physiological Optics: where will the journey lead us in 10 years?
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:235-239.
    PubMed    


    March 2017
  117. ELLIOTT DB
    What is the appropriate gold standard test for refractive error?
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:115-117.
    PubMed    


    January 2017
  118. HENDERSON R
    Evidence for Scottish General Ophthalmic Services improving true-positive referral rate for Glaucoma.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:113.
    PubMed    


  119. CHARMAN WN
    Correcting presbyopia: the problem of pupil size.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37:1-6.
    PubMed    


Thank you for your interest in scientific medicine.


AMEDEO Ophthalmology is free of charge.
This policy is made possible thanks to a media sponsorship by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Design: