Home The Word Brain	My Amedeo FAQ Privacy About	Flying Publisher
	New Amedeo service: Amedeo COVID-19 (formerly 2019-nCoV) Weekly publication summary

Prostate Cancer

Free Subscription Articles published in Radiology Retrieve available abstracts of 44 articles: HTML format Text format

Single Articles

October 2019
1. PADHANI AR, Turkbey B
   Detecting Prostate Cancer with Deep Learning for MRI: A Small Step Forward.
   Radiology. 2019 Oct 8:192012. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019192012.
   PubMed     Text format    
   
   
   September 2019
2. MUEHLEMATTER UJ, Burger IA, Becker AS, Schawkat K, et al
   Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric MRI versus (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for Extracapsular Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
   Radiology. 2019 Sep 10:190687. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190687.
   PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
   
   
   June 2019
3. PEREZ-LOPEZ R, Tunariu N, Padhani AR, Oyen WJG, et al
   Imaging Diagnosis and Follow-up of Advanced Prostate Cancer: Clinical Perspectives and State of the Art.
   Radiology. 2019 Jun 25:181931. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181931.
   PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
   
   
   
4. COLLETTINI F, Enders J, Stephan C, Fischer T, et al
   Image-guided Irreversible Electroporation of Localized Prostate Cancer: Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.
   Radiology. 2019 Jun 4:181987. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181987.
   PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
   
   
   April 2019
5. SIGMUND EE, Rosenkrantz AB
   Diffusion-weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Revisiting Occam's Razor.
   Radiology. 2019 Apr 2:190371. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190371.
   PubMed     Text format    
   
   
   
6. JOHNSTON EW, Bonet-Carne E, Ferizi U, Yvernault B, et al
   VERDICT MRI for Prostate Cancer: Intracellular Volume Fraction versus Apparent Diffusion Coefficient.
   Radiology. 2019 Apr 2:181749. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181749.
   PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
   
   
   March 2019
7. SCIALPI M, Bianconi F, Cantisani V, Palumbo B, et al
   Radiomic Machine Learning: Is It Really a Useful Method for the Characterization of Prostate Cancer?
   Radiology. 2019 Mar 5:182940. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182940.
   PubMed     Text format    
   
   
   January 2019
8. ZHANG M, Milot L, Khalvati F, Sugar L, et al
   Value of Increasing Biopsy Cores per Target with Cognitive MRI-targeted Transrectal US Prostate Biopsy.
   Radiology. 2019 Jan 29:180712. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019180712.
   PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
   
   
   
9. MEHRALIVAND S, Shih JH, Harmon S, Smith C, et al
   A Grading System for the Assessment of Risk of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Multiparametric MRI.
   Radiology. 2019 Jan 22:181278. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181278.
   PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
   
   
   
10. EBERHARDT SC
    Local Staging of Prostate Cancer with MRI: A Need for Standardization.
    Radiology. 2019 Jan 22:182943. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182943.
    PubMed     Text format    
    
    
    
11. WINKEL DJ, Heye TJ, Benz MR, Glessgen CG, et al
    Compressed Sensing Radial Sampling MRI of Prostate Perfusion: Utility for Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Radiology. 2019 Jan 1:180556. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180556.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    November 2018
12. SCIALPI M, Scialpi P, Aisa MC, Martorana E, et al
    Simplified PI-RADS with Biparametric MRI: A Practical Approach to Improve Management of PI-RADS Version 2 Category 3 Lesions.
    Radiology. 2018 Nov 6:182092. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018182092.
    PubMed     Text format    
    
    
    September 2018
13. HICKS RM, Simko JP, Westphalen AC, Nguyen HG, et al
    Diagnostic Accuracy of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI Compared with Multiparametric MRI in the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Radiology. 2018 Sep 18:180788. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018180788.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    
14. CIVELEK AC
    (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET: Better at Detecting Prostate Cancer than Multiparametric MRI?
    Radiology. 2018 Sep 18:181981. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181981.
    PubMed     Text format    
    
    
    August 2018
15. WEINREB JC
    Organized Chaos: Does PI-RADS Version 2 Work in the Transition Zone?
    Radiology. 2018;288:492-494.
    PubMed     Text format    
    
    
    July 2018
16. BONEKAMP D, Kohl S, Wiesenfarth M, Schelb P, et al
    Radiomic Machine Learning for Characterization of Prostate Lesions with MRI: Comparison to ADC Values.
    Radiology. 2018 Jul 31:173064. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018173064.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    
17. SHANKAR PR, Kaza RK, Al-Hawary MM, Masch WR, et al
    Impact of Clinical History on Maximum PI-RADS Version 2 Score: A Six-Reader 120-Case Sham History Retrospective Evaluation.
    Radiology. 2018;288:158-163.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    June 2018
18. STANZIONE A, Cocozza S, Cuocolo R, Imbriaco M, et al
    Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging Protocol: Time to Revise PI-RADS Version 2?
    Radiology. 2018;287:1082.
    PubMed     Text format    
    
    
    May 2018
19. THAI JN, Narayanan HA, George AK, Siddiqui MM, et al
    Validation of PI-RADS Version 2 in Transition Zone Lesions for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Radiology. 2018 May 18:170425. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018170425.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    
20. PARK SY, Zacharias C, Harrison C, Fan RE, et al
    Gallium 68 PSMA-11 PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
    Radiology. 2018 May 16:172232. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172232.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    
21. LOPCI E, Guazzoni G, Lazzeri M
    (68)Ga Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT for Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Complementary or Alternative to Multiparametric MR Imaging.
    Radiology. 2018;287:725-726.
    PubMed     Text format    
    
    
    April 2018
22. LAWTON CAF
    Prostate Cancer: Improving the Flow of Research.
    Radiology. 2018;287:5-9.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    March 2018
23. UENO Y, Tamada T, Takahashi S
    Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Using Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging.
    Radiology. 2018;286:1093-1094.
    PubMed     Text format    
    
    
    February 2018
24. CHATTERJEE A, Bourne RM, Wang S, Devaraj A, et al
    Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer with Noninvasive Estimation of Prostate Tissue Composition by Using Hybrid Multidimensional MR Imaging: A Feasibility Study.
    Radiology. 2018 Feb 2:171130. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018171130.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    
25. KAJI Y, Inamura K
    Diagnostic Ability with Abbreviated Biparametric and Full Multiparametric Prostate MR Imaging: Is the Use of PI-RADS Version 2 Appropriate for Comparison?
    Radiology. 2018;286:726-727.
    PubMed     Text format    
    
    
    January 2018
26. DINH AH, Melodelima C, Souchon R, Moldovan PC, et al
    Characterization of Prostate Cancer with Gleason Score of at Least 7 by Using Quantitative Multiparametric MR Imaging: Validation of a Computer-aided Diagnosis System in Patients Referred for Prostate Biopsy.
    Radiology. 2018 Jan 22:171265. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171265.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    
27. CORNUD F, Roumiguie M, Barry de Longchamps N, Ploussard G, et al
    Precision Matters in MR Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: Evidence from a Prospective Study of Cognitive and Elastic Fusion Registration Transrectal Biopsies.
    Radiology. 2018 Jan 22:162916. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162916.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    
28. SCIALPI M, Martorana E, Aisa MC, Rondoni V, et al
    Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging: Is It Really an Alternative to Multiparametric MR Imaging?
    Radiology. 2018;286:360-361.
    PubMed     Text format    
    
    
    December 2017
29. TEMIZ MZ
    MR Imaging-guided Strategies for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men.
    Radiology. 2017;285:1052-1053.
    PubMed     Text format    
    
    
    
30. THOENY HC, Barbieri S, Froehlich JM, Turkbey B, et al
    Functional and Targeted Lymph Node Imaging in Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Challenges.
    Radiology. 2017;285:728-743.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    November 2017
31. HECTORS SJ, Semaan S, Song C, Lewis S, et al
    Advanced Diffusion-weighted Imaging Modeling for Prostate Cancer Characterization: Correlation with Quantitative Histopathologic Tumor Tissue Composition-A Hypothesis-generating Study.
    Radiology. 2017 Nov 8:170904. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170904.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    
32. VERMA S, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC, Oto A, et al
    The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Radiology. 2017;285:343-356.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    October 2017
33. BOROFSKY S, George AK, Gaur S, Bernardo M, et al
    What Are We Missing? False-Negative Cancers at Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate.
    Radiology. 2017 Oct 20:152877. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017152877.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    July 2017
34. KUHL CK, Bruhn R, Kramer N, Nebelung S, et al
    Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen.
    Radiology. 2017 Jul 20:170129. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170129.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    
35. GREER MD, Shih JH, Lay N, Barrett T, et al
    Validation of the Dominant Sequence Paradigm and Role of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Imaging in PI-RADS Version 2.
    Radiology. 2017 Jul 19:161316. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161316.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    June 2017
36. TAY KJ, Cheng CWS, Lau WKO, Khoo J, et al
    Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer with In-Bore MR-guided Focused Ultrasound: Two-Year Follow-up of a Phase I Trial-Complications and Functional Outcomes.
    Radiology. 2017 Jun 26:161650. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161650.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    
37. KWAK JT, Sankineni S, Xu S, Turkbey B, et al
    Prostate Cancer: A Correlative Study of Multiparametric MR Imaging and Digital Histopathology.
    Radiology. 2017 Jun 5:160906. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017160906.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    May 2017
38. PAHWA S, Schiltz NK, Ponsky LE, Lu Z, et al
    Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging-guided Strategies for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men.
    Radiology. 2017 May 17:162181. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162181.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    April 2017
39. JAMSHIDI N, Margolis DJ, Raman S, Huang J, et al
    Multiregional Radiogenomic Assessment of Prostate Microenvironments with Multiparametric MR Imaging and DNA Whole-Exome Sequencing of Prostate Glands with Adenocarcinoma.
    Radiology. 2017 Apr 28:162827. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162827.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    
40. TAMADA T, Prabhu V, Li J, Babb JS, et al
    Prostate Cancer: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness-Comparison between Conventional and Kurtosis Models.
    Radiology. 2017 Apr 10:162321. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162321.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    
41. SABOURI S, Chang SD, Savdie R, Zhang J, et al
    Luminal Water Imaging: A New MR Imaging T2 Mapping Technique for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.
    Radiology. 2017 Apr 10:161687. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161687.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    March 2017
42. BARTH BK, De Visschere PJ, Cornelius A, Nicolau C, et al
    Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Short Dual-Pulse Sequence versus Standard Multiparametric MR Imaging-A Multireader Study.
    Radiology. 2017 Mar 27:162020. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162020.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    November 2016
43. CHEVILLET JR, Khokhlova TD, Giraldez MD, Schade GR, et al
    Release of Cell-free MicroRNA Tumor Biomarkers into the Blood Circulation with Pulsed Focused Ultrasound: A Noninvasive, Anatomically Localized, Molecular Liquid Biopsy.
    Radiology. 2016 Nov 1:160024.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available
    
    
    
44. JOHNSTON E, Punwani S
    Can We Improve the Reproducibility of Quantitative Multiparametric Prostate MR Imaging Metrics?
    Radiology. 2016;281:652-653.
    PubMed     Text format    
    
    

Thank you for your interest in scientific medicine.

AMEDEO Prostate Cancer is free of charge. This policy is made possible thanks to a media sponsorship by Boehringer Ingelheim. Design: