Home The Word Brain My Amedeo FAQ Privacy About Flying Publisher   


OLIENA
Language recovery after stroke
App | Video | PDF (278 pp) | Web

  Breast Cancer

  Free Subscription


Articles published in AJR Am J Roentgenol

Retrieve available abstracts of 63 articles:
HTML format
Text format



Single Articles


    May 2018
  1. JIANG Y, Inciardi MF, Edwards AV, Papaioannou J, et al
    Interpretation Time Using a Concurrent-Read Computer-Aided Detection System for Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breast Tissue.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 May 24:1-10. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19516.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    April 2018
  2. SCHEEL JR, Kim E, Partridge SC, Lehman CD, et al
    MRI, Clinical Examination, and Mammography for Preoperative Assessment of Residual Disease and Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: ACRIN 6657 Trial.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Apr 30:1-10. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18323.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  3. ROSE SL, Shisler JL
    Tomosynthesis Impact on Breast Cancer Screening in Patients Younger Than 50 Years Old.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Apr 9:1-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18839.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    February 2018
  4. JAVITT MC
    Section Editor's Notebook: Breast Cancer Screening-What Now, and What Next?
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210:239-240.
    PubMed     Text format    


    January 2018
  5. CARTER KJ, Castro F, Morcos RN
    Insights Into Breast Cancer Screening: A Computer Simulation of Two Contemporary Screening Strategies.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jan 11:1-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18484.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    December 2017
  6. MALTEZ DE ALMEIDA JR
    Work in Progress: Subdividing MRI BI-RADS Category 4 Assessment.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:W401.
    PubMed     Text format    


    November 2017
  7. WEAVER O, Leung JWT
    Biomarkers and Imaging of Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov 22:1-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18708.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  8. LEE CS, Moy L, Joe BN, Sickles EA, et al
    Screening for Breast Cancer in Women Age 75 Years and Older.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov 7:1-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18705.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  9. MONTICCIOLO DL, Helvie MA, Hendrick RE
    Current Issues in the Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment of Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov 1:1-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18629.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  10. NEAL CH, Rahman WT, Joe AI, Noroozian M, et al
    Harms of Restrictive Risk-Based Mammographic Breast Cancer Screening.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov 1:1-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18120.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  11. DOGAN BE, Scoggins ME, Son JB, Wei W, et al
    American College of Radiology-Compliant Short Protocol Breast MRI for High-Risk Breast Cancer Screening: A Prospective Feasibility Study.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov 1:1-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18267.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    October 2017
  12. DESTOUNIS S, Santacroce A
    Age to Begin and Intervals for Breast Cancer Screening: Balancing Benefits and Harms.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct 24:1-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18730.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  13. ABRAMSON RG, Lakomkin N, Hainline A, Kang H, et al
    The Attenuation Distribution Across the Long Axis of Breast Cancer Liver Metastases at CT: A Quantitative Biomarker for Predicting Overall Survival.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct 24:W1-W7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18249.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  14. PATEL BK, Lee CS, Kosiorek HE, Newell MS, et al
    Variability of Postsurgical Imaging Surveillance of Breast Cancer Patients: A Nationwide Survey Study.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct 24:1-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.17923.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  15. LEE CS, Moy L, Friedewald SM, Sickles EA, et al
    Harmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and Accountability.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct 18:1-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18704.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    September 2017
  16. AGASTHYA GA, D'Orsi E, Kim YJ, Handa P, et al
    Can Breast Compression Be Reduced in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis?
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Sep 20:W1-W11. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17615.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  17. GEORGIAN-SMITH D
    Screening Mammography: Effect of Recall Rates by Population Type and Acknowledgement of Founding Father Myron Moskowitz.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:W197.
    PubMed     Text format    


  18. YOUK JH, Kim SJ, Son EJ, Gweon HM, et al
    Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:703-708.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    August 2017
  19. HA SM, Chae EY, Cha JH, Kim HH, et al
    Association of BRCA Mutation Types, Imaging Features, and Pathologic Findings in Patients With Breast Cancer With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Aug 10:1-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16957.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  20. BROWN AL, Phillips J, Slanetz PJ, Fein-Zachary V, et al
    Clinical Value of Mammography in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Lumps in Women 30 Years Old and Older.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Aug 4:1-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17088.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  21. HOOLEY RJ, Philpotts LE
    Reply to "Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Assists in Differentiating Vascular Calcification From Malignant Calcification".
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:W116.
    PubMed     Text format    


  22. COHEN Y
    Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Assists in Differentiating Vascular Calcification From Malignant Calcification.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:W115.
    PubMed     Text format    


  23. GRABLER P, Ansell DA
    Reply to "Finding the Best Recall and Cancer Detection Rates for Screening Mammography".
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:W111.
    PubMed     Text format    


  24. SEIDENWURM D, Breslau J
    Finding the Best Recall and Cancer Detection Rates for Screening Mammography.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:W110.
    PubMed     Text format    


    July 2017
  25. JENA A, Taneja S, Singh A, Negi P, et al
    Reliability of 18F-FDG PET Metabolic Parameters Derived Using Simultaneous PET/MRI and Correlation With Prognostic Factors of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: A Feasibility Study.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jul 5:1-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17766.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  26. ALSHAFEIY TI, Wadih A, Nicholson BT, Rochman CM, et al
    Comparison Between Digital and Synthetic 2D Mammograms in Breast Density Interpretation.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:W36-W41.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    June 2017
  27. NATESAN R, Santiago L, Kalambo M, Martaindale S, et al
    The Impact of Patient Demographics on the Selection of Breast Imaging Centers.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jun 28:W1-W10. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17305.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  28. MYERS KS, Green LA, Lebron L, Morris EA, et al
    Imaging Appearance and Clinical Impact of Preoperative Breast MRI in Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jun 13:W1-W7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17124.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  29. STRIGEL RM, Burnside ES, Elezaby M, Fowler AM, et al
    Utility of BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions for Screening Breast MRI.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:1392-1399.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    May 2017
  30. BERGER N, Luparia A, Di Leo G, Carbonaro LA, et al
    Diagnostic Performance of MRI Versus Galactography in Women With Pathologic Nipple Discharge: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 May 24:1-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16682.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  31. TALIAFERRO AS, Fein-Zachary V, Venkataraman S, Mehta TS, et al
    Imaging Features of Spindle Cell Breast Lesions.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 May 24:1-11. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17610.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  32. PITMAN JA, McGinty GB, Soman RR, Drotman MB, et al
    Screening Mammography for Women in Their 40s: The Potential Impact of the American Cancer Society and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 May 15:1-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17759.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    March 2017
  33. EOM HJ, Cha JH, Choi WJ, Chae EY, et al
    Predictive Clinicopathologic and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Findings for Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar 28:1-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17125.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    February 2017
  34. AMORNSIRIPANITCH N, Mangano M, Niell BL
    Screening Mammography: Patient Perceptions and Preferences Regarding Communication of Estimated Breast Cancer Risk.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb 22:1-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16779.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  35. AMINOLOLAMA-SHAKERI S, Flowers CI, McLaren CE, Wisner DJ, et al
    Can Radiologists Predict the Presence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer?
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb 15:1-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16073.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  36. JAVITT MC
    Section Editor's Notebook: The Future of Breast Imaging-Find It and Fix It.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:245-247.
    PubMed     Text format    


  37. HOOLEY RJ, Durand MA, Philpotts LE
    Advances in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:256-266.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    January 2017
  38. PLAZA MJ, Handa P, Esserman LE
    Preoperative MRI Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma: Comparison of Luminal A Versus Luminal B Subtypes in a Paradigm Using Ki-67 and Receptor Status.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan 31:1-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15788.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  39. HUANG ML, Speer M, Dogan BE, Rauch GM, et al
    Imaging-Concordant Benign MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy May Not Warrant MRI Follow-Up.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan 31:1-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16576.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  40. LAM DL, Houssami N, Lee JM
    Imaging Surveillance After Primary Breast Cancer Treatment.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan 11:1-11. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16300.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  41. FERRE R, Omeroglu A, Mesurolle B
    Sonographic Appearance of Lesions Diagnosed as Lobular Neoplasia at Sonographically Guided Biopsies.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan 11:1-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15056.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    December 2016
  42. LEE J, Tanaka E, Eby PR, Zhou S, et al
    Preoperative Breast MRI: Surgeons' Patient Selection Patterns and Potential Bias in Outcomes Analyses.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Dec 27:1-10. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17038.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  43. PARK VY, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Yoon JH, et al
    Perfusion Parameters on Breast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Are Associated With Disease-Specific Survival in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Dec 22:1-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16476.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  44. KRISHNAMURTHY S, Bevers T, Kuerer HM, Smith B, et al
    Paradigm Shifts in Breast Care Delivery: Impact of Imaging in a Multidisciplinary Environment.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    November 2016
  45. DESTOUNIS S, Johnston L, Highnam R, Arieno A, et al
    Using Volumetric Breast Density to Quantify the Potential Masking Risk of Mammographic Density.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  46. RAUCH GM, Adrada BE, Kuerer HM, van la Parra RF, et al
    Multimodality Imaging for Evaluating Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  47. CHHOR CM, Mercado CL
    Abbreviated MRI Protocols: Wave of the Future for Breast Cancer Screening.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  48. PRABHU V, Chhor CM, Ego-Osuala IO, Xiao JM, et al
    Frequency and Outcomes of Incidental Breast Lesions Detected on Abdominal MRI Over a 7-Year Period.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    October 2016
  49. LEWIN AA, Heller SL, Jaglan S, Elias K, et al
    Radiologic-Pathologic Discordance and Outcome After MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  50. FLEMING MM, Holbrook AI, Newell MS
    Update on Image-Guided Percutaneous Ablation of Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  51. HRUSKA CB
    Molecular Breast Imaging for Screening in Dense Breasts: State of the Art and Future Directions.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  52. SHIN K, Caudle AS, Kuerer HM, Santiago L, et al
    Radiologic Mapping for Targeted Axillary Dissection: Needle Biopsy to Excision.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    September 2016
  53. GRABLER P, Sighoko D, Wang L, Allgood K, et al
    Recall and Cancer Detection Rates for Screening Mammography: Finding the Sweet Spot.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    August 2016
  54. KU YJ, Kim HH, Cha JH, Shin HJ, et al
    Correlation Between MRI and the Level of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    May 2016
  55. SHERMIS RB, Wilson KD, Doyle MT, Martin TS, et al
    Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening With Molecular Breast Imaging for Women With Dense Breast Tissue.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  56. YOUK JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ, Kim JA, et al
    Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:1056-62.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    March 2016
  57. DRYDEN MJ, Dogan BE, Fox P, Wang C, et al
    Imaging Factors That Influence Surgical Margins After Preoperative I Radioactive Seed Localization of Breast Lesions: Comparison With Wire Localization.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  58. EKPO EU, Ujong UP, Mello-Thoms C, McEntee MF, et al
    Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  59. CHAE EY, Cha JH, Shin HJ, Choi WJ, et al
    Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:666-72.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  60. ALSHARIF S, Ferre R, Omeroglu A, Khoury ME, et al
    Imaging Features Associated With Posttraumatic Breast Neuromas.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:660-5.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    February 2016
  61. GUPTA D, Karst I, Mendelson EB
    Value-Based Reimbursement: Impact of Curtailing Physician Autonomy in Medical Decision Making.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:276-9.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  62. FERRE R, Aldis A, AlSharif S, Omeroglu A, et al
    Differentiation of Fibroadenomas and Pure Mucinous Carcinomas on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast Using Volume Segmentation for Kinetic Analysis: A Feasibility Study.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:253-8.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  63. BITENCOURT AG, Graziano L, Osorio CA, Guatelli CS, et al
    MRI Features of Mucinous Cancer of the Breast: Correlation With Pathologic Findings and Other Imaging Methods.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:238-46.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


Thank you for your interest in scientific medicine.


AMEDEO Breast Cancer is free of charge.
This policy is made possible thanks to a media sponsorship by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Design: