Home The Word Brain My Amedeo FAQ Privacy About Flying Publisher   


OLIENA
Language recovery after stroke
App | Video | PDF (278 pp) | Web

  Colorectal Neoplasms

  Free Subscription


Articles published in Gastrointest Endosc

Retrieve available abstracts of 61 articles:
HTML format
Text format



Single Articles


    October 2018
  1. MA K, Melson J
    Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates: monitoring and reducing the worst-case scenario.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:712-714.
    PubMed     Text format    


    September 2018
  2. BRONZWAER MES, Depla ACTM, van Lelyveld N, Spanier MBW, et al
    Quality assurance of colonoscopy within the Dutch national colorectal cancer screening program.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep 18. pii: S0016-5107(18)33037.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  3. TRIANTAFYLLOU K, Tziatzios G, Gkolfakis P
    Meta-analysis evaluating colonoscopy novelties: mind the methodology!
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:576-577.
    PubMed     Text format    


  4. KUNNATHU ND, Mankaney GN, Leone PJ, Cruise MW, et al
    Worrisome endoscopic feature in the stomach of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: the proximal white mucosal patch.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:569-570.
    PubMed     Text format    


    August 2018
  5. ANDERSON JC, Robertson DJ
    Monitoring compliance with colorectal cancer screening: Do we have it covered?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:332-334.
    PubMed     Text format    


    May 2018
  6. ERTEM FU, Ladabaum U, Mehrotra A, Tehranian S, et al
    Incidence of Interval Colorectal Cancer Attributable to an Endoscopist in Clinical Practice.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May 24. pii: S0016-5107(18)32706.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    April 2018
  7. HASSAN C, Repici A
    Colorectal polyp snaring: the smaller, the colder, the bigger!
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1104-1105.
    PubMed     Text format    


  8. SOETIKNO R, East J, Suzuki N, Uedo N, et al
    Endoscopic submucosal dissection for nonpolypoid colorectal dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: in medias res.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1085-1094.
    PubMed     Text format    


    March 2018
  9. YABUUCHI Y, Imai K, Hotta K, Ito S, et al
    Higher incidence of metachronous advanced neoplasia in patients with synchronous advanced neoplasia and left-sided colorectal resection for colorectal cancer.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar 21. pii: S0016-5107(18)30215.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  10. PARK CH, Kim NH, Park JH, Park DI, et al
    Individualized colorectal cancer screening based on the clinical risk factors: beyond family history of colorectal cancer.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar 3. pii: S0016-5107(18)30189.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  11. KOTWAL V, Chawla S
    Are small adenomas on initial colonoscopy really a risk factor for advanced neoplasia on surveillance colonoscopy?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:903-904.
    PubMed     Text format    


  12. PAPASTERGIOU V, Paraskeva KD, Paspatis GA
    Should we use EMR to resect small colorectal polyps? The jury is still out.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:902.
    PubMed     Text format    


  13. YU C, Rao SSC
    Rectal EMR for enteric ganglia: Is deeper better?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:881-882.
    PubMed     Text format    


  14. YANG D, Draganov PV
    Removing large rectal polyps: when the whole may be greater than the sum of its parts.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:872-874.
    PubMed     Text format    


  15. MALHOTRA A, Shaukat A
    Should the colonoscopy patient practice sex and age discrimination?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:787-788.
    PubMed     Text format    


  16. MA K, Melson J
    Managing the patient with colorectal adenomas found at an early age.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:674-676.
    PubMed     Text format    


    February 2018
  17. MURPHY CC, Sigel BM, Yang E, Skinner CS, et al
    Adherence to colorectal cancer screening measured as the proportion of time covered.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Feb 22. pii: S0016-5107(18)30137.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  18. QI ZP, Shi Q, Liu JZ, Yao LQ, et al
    Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for submucosal tumors of the colon and rectum.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:540-548.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  19. JEON MK, So H, Huh J, Hwang HS, et al
    Endoscopic features and clinical outcomes of colorectal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:529-539.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  20. GROSSBERG LB, Vodonos A, Papamichael K, Novack V, et al
    Predictors of post-colonoscopy emergency department use.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:517-525.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    January 2018
  21. MURTHY SK, Benchimol EI, Tinmouth J, James PD, et al
    Temporal trends in postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates in screen-eligible persons: a population-based study.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan 6. pii: S0016-5107(18)30014.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  22. LIEBERMAN D
    Is it safe to wait 10 years after a negative baseline screening colonoscopy result?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:260-261.
    PubMed     Text format    


  23. REPICI A, Hassan C
    Postsurgery risk for nonmalignant colorectal polyps: the ultimate call.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:251-253.
    PubMed     Text format    


  24. TATE DJ, Jayanna M, Awadie H, Desomer L, et al
    A standardized imaging protocol for the endoscopic prediction of dysplasia within sessile serrated polyps (with video).
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:222-231.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  25. REX DK, Ponugoti PL, Johnson CS, Kittner L, et al
    Neoplasia at 10-year follow-up screening colonoscopy in a private U.S. practice: comparison of yield to first-time examinations.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:254-259.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  26. TSIAMOULOS ZP, Misra R, Rameshshanker R, Elliott TR, et al
    Impact of a new distal attachment on colonoscopy performance in an academic screening center.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:280-287.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  27. PEERY AF, Shaheen NJ, Cools KS, Baron TH, et al
    Morbidity and mortality after surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:243-250.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  28. DE PALMA GD, Giglio MC, Bruzzese D, Gennarelli N, et al
    Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:232-240.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  29. BUDIHAL S, Ragunath K
    Cardiac ischemia after epinephrine injection during EMR for a large rectal polyp.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:306-308.
    PubMed     Text format    


  30. DI MITRI R, Mocciaro F, Lipani M
    One-session "2-step" technique for endoscopic full-thickness resection of a large rectal adenocarcinoma: when it is possible, overcome the lesion's size.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:314-315.
    PubMed     Text format    


  31. CARRARA S, Di Leo M, Spaggiari P, Bagnoli PF, et al
    Rectal metastases from malignant mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas mimicking a rectal carcinoma.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:312-313.
    PubMed     Text format    


    December 2017
  32. SAXENA AP, Limdi JK, Farraye FA
    Zeroing in on endoscopic and histologic mucosal healing to reduce the risk of colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:1012-1014.
    PubMed     Text format    


    November 2017
  33. IMPERIALE TF
    The rising prevalence of early-onset colorectal cancer: Ready and FIT to tackle?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:900-902.
    PubMed     Text format    


    October 2017
  34. MCGILL SK, Soetikno R, Kaltenbach T
    Optical diagnosis of early colorectal cancer: riding the highs and lows of the Japanese Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:710-712.
    PubMed     Text format    


  35. MANKANEY G, Burke CA
    Risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia in patients with diminutive versus small tubular adenomas: Is the juice worth the squeeze?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:722-723.
    PubMed     Text format    


    August 2017
  36. KANTSEVOY SV
    Stenosis after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: When to expect, how to manage?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:370-371.
    PubMed     Text format    


    July 2017
  37. SAITO Y, Bhatt A, Matsuda T
    Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and its journey to the West.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:90-92.
    PubMed     Text format    


  38. HEITMAN SJ, Bourke MJ
    Endoscopic submucosal dissection and EMR for large colorectal polyps: "the perfect is the enemy of good".
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:87-89.
    PubMed     Text format    


  39. RAHMAN I, Patel P
    Avulsion for the treatment of visible residual neoplasia during EMR of colorectal polyps: Is "heat" required?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:250-251.
    PubMed     Text format    


    June 2017
  40. CHAWLA S, Qayed E
    Learning curve for EMR of large nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia: an alternative analysis method using longitudinal models.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1309-1310.
    PubMed     Text format    


  41. PETRINI JL JR
    Colonoscopy surveillance intervals: we are not there yet.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1271-1272.
    PubMed     Text format    


    May 2017
  42. AL-BAWARDY B, Rajan E, Wong Kee Song LM
    Over-the-scope clip-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection of epithelial and subepithelial GI lesions.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1087-1092.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  43. RUIZ-REBOLLO ML
    Postcolonoscopy colorectal carcinoma.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1113.
    PubMed     Text format    


    April 2017
  44. CASSANI LS, Lanke G, Chen HC, Wang X, et al
    Comparison of nonampullary duodenal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis versus patients with sporadic adenomas.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:803-812.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  45. SUMIMOTO K, Tanaka S, Shigita K, Hirano D, et al
    Clinical impact and characteristics of the narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:816-821.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  46. HEWETT DG, Sakata S
    Classifications for optical diagnosis of colorectal lesions: not 2B with JNET.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:822-828.
    PubMed     Text format    


  47. KANTH P, Samadder NJ, DiSario J
    Duodenal adenomas in sporadic and familial adenomatous polyposis patients: Birds of a feather?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:813-815.
    PubMed     Text format    


    March 2017
  48. TATE DJ, Desomer L, Klein A, Brown G, et al
    Adenoma recurrence after piecemeal colonic EMR is predictable: the Sydney EMR recurrence tool.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:647-656.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  49. SUGIMOTO S, Naganuma M, Iwao Y, Matsuoka K, et al
    Endoscopic morphologic features of ulcerative colitis-associated dysplasia classified according to the SCENIC consensus statement.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:639-646.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  50. KUDO T, Kudo SE, Mori Y, Wakamura K, et al
    Classification of nuclear morphology in endocytoscopy of colorectal neoplasms.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:628-638.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  51. PONUGOTI P, Lin J, Odze R, Snover D, et al
    Prevalence of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp in hyperplastic-appearing diminutive rectosigmoid polyps.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:622-627.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  52. REX DK, Ponugoti P, Kahi C
    The "valley sign" in small and diminutive adenomas: prevalence, interobserver agreement, and validation as an adenoma marker.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:614-621.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  53. VON RENTELN D, Robertson DJ, Bensen S, Pohl H, et al
    Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:574-580.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  54. LEE A, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, et al
    Endoscopist fatigue estimates and colonoscopic adenoma detection in a large community-based setting.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:601-610.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  55. MURAKAMI T, Sakamoto N, Ritsuno H, Shibuya T, et al
    Distinct endoscopic characteristics of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp with and without dysplasia/carcinoma.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:590-600.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  56. MELSON J, Berger D, Greenspan M, Bayoumi M, et al
    Maintaining low non-neoplastic polypectomy rates in high-quality screening colonoscopy.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:581-587.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  57. MOAVEN J, Shami VM
    Predicting pathologic response: the "bottom line" in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:675-676.
    PubMed     Text format    


  58. ALMARIO CV, Spiegel BM
    Does endoscopist fatigue impact adenoma detection rate? A review of the evidence to date.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:611-613.
    PubMed     Text format    


  59. WESTON BR, Ross WA
    Quality metrics: beyond adenoma detection rate.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:588-589.
    PubMed     Text format    


  60. REX DK, Hassan C, Dewitt JM
    Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in the United States: Why do we hear so much about it and do so little of it?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:554-558.
    PubMed     Text format    


    February 2017
  61. POLYDORIDES AD, Harpaz N
    Serrated lesions in inflammatory bowel disease.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:461.
    PubMed     Text format    


Thank you for your interest in scientific medicine.


AMEDEO Colorectal Neoplasms is free of charge.
This policy is made possible thanks to a media sponsorship by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Design: