Home The Word Brain My Amedeo FAQ Privacy About Flying Publisher   


OLIENA
Language recovery after stroke
App | Video | PDF (278 pp) | Web

  Colorectal Neoplasms

  Free Subscription


Articles published in Gastrointest Endosc

Retrieve available abstracts of 122 articles:
HTML format
Text format



Single Articles


    March 2019
  1. GRIMM IS, McGill SK
    Look, but don't touch: what not to do in managing large colorectal polyps.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:479-481.
    PubMed     Text format    


    February 2019
  2. PARK CH, Jung YS, Kim NH, Park JH, et al
    Usefulness of risk stratification models for colorectal cancer based on fecal hemoglobin concentration and clinical risk factors.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Feb 25. pii: S0016-5107(19)30138.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  3. ROOS VH, Bastiaansen BAJ, Dekker E
    Challenges and pitfalls of investigating duodenal cancer in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:355-356.
    PubMed     Text format    


    January 2019
  4. KUELLMER A, Mueller J, Caca K, Aepli P, et al
    Endoscopic full-thickness resection for early colorectal cancer.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jan 14. pii: S0016-5107(19)30013.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    December 2018
  5. PARKER RK, Ranketi SS, McNelly C, Ongondi M, et al
    Colorectal cancer is increasing in rural Kenya: challenges and perspectives.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Dec 10. pii: S0016-5107(18)33346.
    PubMed     Text format    


    November 2018
  6. YANG HJ, Cho CW, Kim SS, Ahn KS, et al
    Application of deep learning to predict advanced neoplasia using big clinical data in colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Nov 4. pii: S0016-5107(18)33254.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  7. CAMERON K, Moss A
    Is 35 the new 50? Challenges in determining colonoscopy surveillance recommendations for young patients with incidentally detected adenomas.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:826-829.
    PubMed     Text format    


  8. KUDO T, Saito Y, Ikematsu H, Hotta K, et al
    New-generation full-spectrum endoscopy versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy: a multicenter, randomized, tandem colonoscopy trial (J-FUSE Study).
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:854-864.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    October 2018
  9. HASSAN C, Senore C, Manes G, Fuccio L, et al
    Diagnostic Yield and Miss Rate of EndoRings in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: the SMART (Study Methodology for ADR-Related Technology) Trial.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Oct 23. pii: S0016-5107(18)33191.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  10. SHINAGAWA T, Hata K, Morikawa T, Takiyama H, et al
    Pine-cone and villi patterns are endoscopic signs suggestive of ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer and dysplasia.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Oct 13. pii: S0016-5107(18)33165.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  11. MA K, Melson J
    Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates: monitoring and reducing the worst-case scenario.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:712-714.
    PubMed     Text format    


  12. CRUZ-CORREA M, Gonzalez-Pons MDM
    Reassessing colectomy in young patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:734-736.
    PubMed     Text format    


  13. REININK AR, Shaukat A
    Age is not just a number: surveillance colonoscopy is low yield in individuals younger than 50.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:724-725.
    PubMed     Text format    


  14. FUCCIO L, Frazzoni L, Hassan C, La Marca M, et al
    Water exchange colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:589-597.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  15. SARVEPALLI S, Burke CA, Monachese M, Leach BH, et al
    Natural history of colonic polyposis in young patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:726-733.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  16. KIM NH, Jung YS, Park JH, Park DI, et al
    Risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after colonoscopic polypectomy in patients aged 30 to 39 and 40 to 49 years.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:715-723.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  17. HURLEY JJ, Thomas LE, Walton SJ, Thomas-Gibson S, et al
    The impact of chromoendoscopy for surveillance of the duodenum in patients with MUTYH-associated polyposis and familial adenomatous polyposis.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:665-673.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    September 2018
  18. DANG H, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, van der Zwaan SMS, van den Akker-van Marle ME, et al
    Quality of life and fear of cancer recurrence in T1 colorectal cancer patients treated with endoscopic or surgical tumor resection.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep 28. pii: S0016-5107(18)33136.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  19. BRONZWAER MES, Depla ACTM, van Lelyveld N, Spanier MBW, et al
    Quality assurance of colonoscopy within the Dutch national colorectal cancer screening program.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep 18. pii: S0016-5107(18)33037.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  20. TRIANTAFYLLOU K, Tziatzios G, Gkolfakis P
    Meta-analysis evaluating colonoscopy novelties: mind the methodology!
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:576-577.
    PubMed     Text format    


  21. KUNNATHU ND, Mankaney GN, Leone PJ, Cruise MW, et al
    Worrisome endoscopic feature in the stomach of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: the proximal white mucosal patch.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:569-570.
    PubMed     Text format    


  22. REPICI A, Wallace M, Sharma P, Bhandari P, et al
    A novel submucosal injection solution for endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions: a randomized, double-blind trial.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:527-535.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  23. THORLACIUS H, Jerkeman A, Marginean FE, Toth E, et al
    Colorectal malakoplakia in a patient with hypogammaglobulinemia.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:563-565.
    PubMed     Text format    


    August 2018
  24. ANDERSON JC, Robertson DJ
    Monitoring compliance with colorectal cancer screening: Do we have it covered?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:332-334.
    PubMed     Text format    


  25. BITAR H, Zia H, Bashir M, Parava P, et al
    Impact of fellowship training level on colonoscopy quality and efficiency metrics.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:378-387.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  26. ROOS VH, Bastiaansen BAJ, Dekker E
    Gastric adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: you only see them when you know what to look for.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:403-405.
    PubMed     Text format    


  27. CASTANEDA D, Popov VB, Verheyen E, Wander P, et al
    New technologies improve adenoma detection rate, adenoma miss rate, and polyp detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:209-222.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  28. REX DK, Repici A, Gross SA, Hassan C, et al
    High-definition colonoscopy versus Endocuff versus EndoRings versus full-spectrum endoscopy for adenoma detection at colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:335-344.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  29. UTSUMI T, Iwatate M, Sano Y
    A vanishing superficial depressed colorectal lesion in a patient with ulcerative colitis.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:406-407.
    PubMed     Text format    


    July 2018
  30. DESILETS DJ, Hwang JH, Kyanam Kabir Baig KR, Leung FW, et al
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Editorial Board top 10 topics: advances in GI endoscopy in 2017.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:1-8.
    PubMed     Text format    


  31. IM JP, Kim D, Chung SJ, Jin EH, et al
    Visceral obesity as a risk factor for colorectal adenoma occurrence in surveillance colonoscopy.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:119-127.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  32. GILG MM, Grochenig HP, Schlemmer A, Eherer A, et al
    Secondary tumors of the GI tract: origin, histology, and endoscopic findings.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:151-158.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  33. PIOCHE M, Denis A, Allescher HD, Andrisani G, et al
    Impact of 2 generational improvements in colonoscopes on adenoma miss rates: results of a prospective randomized multicenter tandem study.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:107-116.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  34. MA MX, Kong J, Hillery S, Cheah K, et al
    An uncommon cecal bulge caused by a large appendiceal mucinous neoplasm.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:189-190.
    PubMed     Text format    


  35. STRUYVE M, Ferrante M, van Overbeke L, Meersseman W, et al
    Unusual yellow scaly colonic mucosal appearance: Tangier disease.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:193-195.
    PubMed     Text format    


    June 2018
  36. TRINDADE AJ, Rishi A, Hirten R, Inamdar S, et al
    Identification of volumetric laser endomicroscopy features of colon polyps with histologic correlation.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1558-1564.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  37. LEE YJ, Yoon JY, Park JJ, Park SJ, et al
    Clinical outcomes and factors related to colonic perforations in patients receiving self-expandable metal stent insertion for malignant colorectal obstruction.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1548-1557.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  38. KIM HS, Jung HY, Park HJ, Kim HM, et al
    Hot snare polypectomy with or without saline solution/epinephrine lift for the complete resection of small colorectal polyps.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1539-1547.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  39. HAMOUDAH T, Ma K, Esteban M, Hayat W, et al
    Patients with small and diminutive proximal hyperplastic polyps have higher rates of synchronous advanced neoplasia compared with patients without serrated lesions.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1518-1526.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  40. MALMSTROM ML, Saftoiu A, Riis LB, Hassan H, et al
    Dynamic contrast-enhanced EUS for quantification of tumor perfusion in colonic cancer: a prospective cohort study.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1530-1538.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  41. NISHIKAWA J, Miura O, Hashimoto S, Sakaida I, et al
    Colon adenoma with 2 too-long stalks (with video).
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1590-1592.
    PubMed     Text format    


    May 2018
  42. ERTEM FU, Ladabaum U, Mehrotra A, Tehranian S, et al
    Incidence of Interval Colorectal Cancer Attributable to an Endoscopist in Clinical Practice.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May 24. pii: S0016-5107(18)32706.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  43. SAKAMOTO T, Nakajima T, Matsuda T, Murakami Y, et al
    Comparison of the diagnostic performance between magnifying chromoendoscopy and magnifying narrow-band imaging for superficial colorectal neoplasms: an online survey.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1318-1323.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  44. TATE DJ, Desomer L, Awadie H, Goodrick K, et al
    EMR of laterally spreading lesions around or involving the appendiceal orifice: technique, risk factors for failure, and outcomes of a tertiary referral cohort (with video).
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1279-1288.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  45. KRUGLIAK CLEVELAND N, Huo D, Sadiq F, Sofia MA, et al
    Assessment of peri-polyp biopsy specimens of flat mucosa in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1304-1309.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  46. NAGATA M
    Usefulness of underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection in saline solution with a monopolar knife for colorectal tumors (with videos).
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1345-1353.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  47. VLEUGELS JLA, Sahin H, Hazewinkel Y, Koens L, et al
    Endoscopic detection rate of sessile serrated lesions in Lynch syndrome patients is comparable with an age- and gender-matched control population: case-control study with expert pathology review.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1289-1296.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    April 2018
  48. HASSAN C, Repici A
    Colorectal polyp snaring: the smaller, the colder, the bigger!
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1104-1105.
    PubMed     Text format    


  49. SOETIKNO R, East J, Suzuki N, Uedo N, et al
    Endoscopic submucosal dissection for nonpolypoid colorectal dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: in medias res.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1085-1094.
    PubMed     Text format    


  50. LIN D, Soetikno RM, McQuaid K, Pham C, et al
    Risk factors for postpolypectomy bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulation or antiplatelet medications.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1106-1113.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  51. KINOSHITA S, Uraoka T, Nishizawa T, Naganuma M, et al
    The role of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with ulcerative colitis.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1079-1084.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  52. SUZUKI S, Gotoda T, Kusano C, Ikehara H, et al
    Width and depth of resection for small colorectal polyps: hot versus cold snare polypectomy.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1095-1103.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    March 2018
  53. YABUUCHI Y, Imai K, Hotta K, Ito S, et al
    Higher incidence of metachronous advanced neoplasia in patients with synchronous advanced neoplasia and left-sided colorectal resection for colorectal cancer.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar 21. pii: S0016-5107(18)30215.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  54. PARK CH, Kim NH, Park JH, Park DI, et al
    Individualized colorectal cancer screening based on the clinical risk factors: beyond family history of colorectal cancer.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar 3. pii: S0016-5107(18)30189.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  55. KOTWAL V, Chawla S
    Are small adenomas on initial colonoscopy really a risk factor for advanced neoplasia on surveillance colonoscopy?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:903-904.
    PubMed     Text format    


  56. PAPASTERGIOU V, Paraskeva KD, Paspatis GA
    Should we use EMR to resect small colorectal polyps? The jury is still out.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:902.
    PubMed     Text format    


  57. YU C, Rao SSC
    Rectal EMR for enteric ganglia: Is deeper better?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:881-882.
    PubMed     Text format    


  58. YANG D, Draganov PV
    Removing large rectal polyps: when the whole may be greater than the sum of its parts.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:872-874.
    PubMed     Text format    


  59. MALHOTRA A, Shaukat A
    Should the colonoscopy patient practice sex and age discrimination?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:787-788.
    PubMed     Text format    


  60. MA K, Melson J
    Managing the patient with colorectal adenomas found at an early age.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:674-676.
    PubMed     Text format    


  61. STIER MW, Chapman CG, Kreitman A, Hart JA, et al
    Dissection-enabled scaffold-assisted resection (DeSCAR): a novel technique for resection of residual or non-lifting GI neoplasia of the colon (with video).
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:843-851.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  62. TUTTICCI NJ, Hewett DG
    Cold EMR of large sessile serrated polyps at colonoscopy (with video).
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:837-842.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  63. KOBAYASHI R, Hirasawa K, Sato C, Makazu M, et al
    Utility of multi-detector computed tomography scans after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective study.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:818-826.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  64. GUTIERREZ SANCHEZ LH, Alsawas M, Stephens M, Murad MH, et al
    Upper GI involvement in children with familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome: single-center experience and meta-analysis of the literature.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:648-656.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  65. BRONZWAER MES, Musters GD, Barendse RM, Koens L, et al
    The occurrence and characteristics of endoscopically unexpected malignant degeneration in large rectal adenomas.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:862-871.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  66. GRAVITO-SOARES E, Gravito-Soares M, Amaro P, Cipriano MA, et al
    Postmucosectomy colonic pseudoperforation.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:896-897.
    PubMed     Text format    


  67. KIM TJ, Kim ER, Hong SN, Kim YH, et al
    Adenoma detection rate influences the risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia in low-risk patients.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:809-817.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  68. PARK SK, Yang HJ, Jung YS, Park JH, et al
    Risk of advanced colorectal neoplasm by the proposed combined United States and United Kingdom risk stratification guidelines.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:800-808.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  69. MEHROTRA A, Morris M, Gourevitch RA, Carrell DS, et al
    Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:778-786.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  70. LI D, Woolfrey J, Jiang SF, Jensen CD, et al
    Diagnosis and predictors of sessile serrated adenoma after educational training in a large, community-based, integrated healthcare setting.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:755-765.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  71. BODA K, Oka S, Tanaka S, Nagata S, et al
    Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors: a large multicenter retrospective study from the Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Research Group.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:714-722.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  72. KIM HG, Cho YS, Cha JM, Shin JE, et al
    Risk of metachronous neoplasia on surveillance colonoscopy in young patients with colorectal neoplasia.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:666-673.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  73. VERSTOCKT B, Van Driessche A, De Man M, van der Spek P, et al
    Ten-year survival after endoscopic stent placement as a bridge to surgery in obstructing colon cancer.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:705-713.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  74. PARODI A, Vanbiervliet G, Hassan C, Hebuterne X, et al
    Colon capsule endoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in those with family histories of colorectal cancer.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:695-704.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  75. NAGPAL SJS, Mukhija D, Sanaka M, Lopez R, et al
    Metachronous colon polyps in younger versus older adults: a case-control study.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:657-665.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  76. LEE HS, Kim SB, Lee HJ, Park SJ, et al
    Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a lower incidence of colorectal adenomas in patients with previous colorectal cancer.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:688-694.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    February 2018
  77. MURPHY CC, Sigel BM, Yang E, Skinner CS, et al
    Adherence to colorectal cancer screening measured as the proportion of time covered.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Feb 22. pii: S0016-5107(18)30137.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  78. QI ZP, Shi Q, Liu JZ, Yao LQ, et al
    Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for submucosal tumors of the colon and rectum.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:540-548.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  79. JEON MK, So H, Huh J, Hwang HS, et al
    Endoscopic features and clinical outcomes of colorectal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:529-539.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  80. GROSSBERG LB, Vodonos A, Papamichael K, Novack V, et al
    Predictors of post-colonoscopy emergency department use.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:517-525.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


    January 2018
  81. MURTHY SK, Benchimol EI, Tinmouth J, James PD, et al
    Temporal trends in postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates in screen-eligible persons: a population-based study.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan 6. pii: S0016-5107(18)30014.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  82. DAVEE T, Coronel E, Papafragkakis C, Thaiudom S, et al
    Pancreatic cancer screening in high-risk individuals with germline genetic mutations.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan 5. pii: S0016-5107(18)30005.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  83. LIEBERMAN D
    Is it safe to wait 10 years after a negative baseline screening colonoscopy result?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:260-261.
    PubMed     Text format    


  84. REPICI A, Hassan C
    Postsurgery risk for nonmalignant colorectal polyps: the ultimate call.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:251-253.
    PubMed     Text format    


  85. TATE DJ, Jayanna M, Awadie H, Desomer L, et al
    A standardized imaging protocol for the endoscopic prediction of dysplasia within sessile serrated polyps (with video).
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:222-231.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  86. REX DK, Ponugoti PL, Johnson CS, Kittner L, et al
    Neoplasia at 10-year follow-up screening colonoscopy in a private U.S. practice: comparison of yield to first-time examinations.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:254-259.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  87. TSIAMOULOS ZP, Misra R, Rameshshanker R, Elliott TR, et al
    Impact of a new distal attachment on colonoscopy performance in an academic screening center.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:280-287.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  88. PEERY AF, Shaheen NJ, Cools KS, Baron TH, et al
    Morbidity and mortality after surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:243-250.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  89. DE PALMA GD, Giglio MC, Bruzzese D, Gennarelli N, et al
    Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:232-240.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  90. BUDIHAL S, Ragunath K
    Cardiac ischemia after epinephrine injection during EMR for a large rectal polyp.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:306-308.
    PubMed     Text format    


  91. DI MITRI R, Mocciaro F, Lipani M
    One-session "2-step" technique for endoscopic full-thickness resection of a large rectal adenocarcinoma: when it is possible, overcome the lesion's size.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:314-315.
    PubMed     Text format    


  92. CARRARA S, Di Leo M, Spaggiari P, Bagnoli PF, et al
    Rectal metastases from malignant mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas mimicking a rectal carcinoma.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:312-313.
    PubMed     Text format    


    December 2017
  93. SAXENA AP, Limdi JK, Farraye FA
    Zeroing in on endoscopic and histologic mucosal healing to reduce the risk of colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:1012-1014.
    PubMed     Text format    


    November 2017
  94. IMPERIALE TF
    The rising prevalence of early-onset colorectal cancer: Ready and FIT to tackle?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:900-902.
    PubMed     Text format    


    October 2017
  95. MCGILL SK, Soetikno R, Kaltenbach T
    Optical diagnosis of early colorectal cancer: riding the highs and lows of the Japanese Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:710-712.
    PubMed     Text format    


  96. MANKANEY G, Burke CA
    Risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia in patients with diminutive versus small tubular adenomas: Is the juice worth the squeeze?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:722-723.
    PubMed     Text format    


    August 2017
  97. KANTSEVOY SV
    Stenosis after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: When to expect, how to manage?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:370-371.
    PubMed     Text format    


    July 2017
  98. SAITO Y, Bhatt A, Matsuda T
    Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and its journey to the West.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:90-92.
    PubMed     Text format    


  99. HEITMAN SJ, Bourke MJ
    Endoscopic submucosal dissection and EMR for large colorectal polyps: "the perfect is the enemy of good".
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:87-89.
    PubMed     Text format    


  100. RAHMAN I, Patel P
    Avulsion for the treatment of visible residual neoplasia during EMR of colorectal polyps: Is "heat" required?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:250-251.
    PubMed     Text format    


    June 2017
  101. CHAWLA S, Qayed E
    Learning curve for EMR of large nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia: an alternative analysis method using longitudinal models.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1309-1310.
    PubMed     Text format    


  102. PETRINI JL JR
    Colonoscopy surveillance intervals: we are not there yet.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1271-1272.
    PubMed     Text format    


    May 2017
  103. AL-BAWARDY B, Rajan E, Wong Kee Song LM
    Over-the-scope clip-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection of epithelial and subepithelial GI lesions.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1087-1092.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  104. RUIZ-REBOLLO ML
    Postcolonoscopy colorectal carcinoma.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1113.
    PubMed     Text format    


    April 2017
  105. CASSANI LS, Lanke G, Chen HC, Wang X, et al
    Comparison of nonampullary duodenal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis versus patients with sporadic adenomas.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:803-812.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  106. SUMIMOTO K, Tanaka S, Shigita K, Hirano D, et al
    Clinical impact and characteristics of the narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:816-821.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  107. HEWETT DG, Sakata S
    Classifications for optical diagnosis of colorectal lesions: not 2B with JNET.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:822-828.
    PubMed     Text format    


  108. KANTH P, Samadder NJ, DiSario J
    Duodenal adenomas in sporadic and familial adenomatous polyposis patients: Birds of a feather?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:813-815.
    PubMed     Text format    


    March 2017
  109. TATE DJ, Desomer L, Klein A, Brown G, et al
    Adenoma recurrence after piecemeal colonic EMR is predictable: the Sydney EMR recurrence tool.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:647-656.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  110. SUGIMOTO S, Naganuma M, Iwao Y, Matsuoka K, et al
    Endoscopic morphologic features of ulcerative colitis-associated dysplasia classified according to the SCENIC consensus statement.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:639-646.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  111. KUDO T, Kudo SE, Mori Y, Wakamura K, et al
    Classification of nuclear morphology in endocytoscopy of colorectal neoplasms.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:628-638.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  112. PONUGOTI P, Lin J, Odze R, Snover D, et al
    Prevalence of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp in hyperplastic-appearing diminutive rectosigmoid polyps.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:622-627.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  113. REX DK, Ponugoti P, Kahi C
    The "valley sign" in small and diminutive adenomas: prevalence, interobserver agreement, and validation as an adenoma marker.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:614-621.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  114. VON RENTELN D, Robertson DJ, Bensen S, Pohl H, et al
    Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:574-580.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  115. LEE A, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, et al
    Endoscopist fatigue estimates and colonoscopic adenoma detection in a large community-based setting.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:601-610.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  116. MURAKAMI T, Sakamoto N, Ritsuno H, Shibuya T, et al
    Distinct endoscopic characteristics of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp with and without dysplasia/carcinoma.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:590-600.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  117. MELSON J, Berger D, Greenspan M, Bayoumi M, et al
    Maintaining low non-neoplastic polypectomy rates in high-quality screening colonoscopy.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:581-587.
    PubMed     Text format     Abstract available


  118. MOAVEN J, Shami VM
    Predicting pathologic response: the "bottom line" in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:675-676.
    PubMed     Text format    


  119. ALMARIO CV, Spiegel BM
    Does endoscopist fatigue impact adenoma detection rate? A review of the evidence to date.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:611-613.
    PubMed     Text format    


  120. WESTON BR, Ross WA
    Quality metrics: beyond adenoma detection rate.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:588-589.
    PubMed     Text format    


  121. REX DK, Hassan C, Dewitt JM
    Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in the United States: Why do we hear so much about it and do so little of it?
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:554-558.
    PubMed     Text format    


    February 2017
  122. POLYDORIDES AD, Harpaz N
    Serrated lesions in inflammatory bowel disease.
    Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:461.
    PubMed     Text format    


Thank you for your interest in scientific medicine.


AMEDEO Colorectal Neoplasms is free of charge.
This policy is made possible thanks to a media sponsorship by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Design: